delta/git.git/t/t4021-format-patch-numbered.sh, branch hv/mv-nested-submodules-test github.com: git/git.git format-patch: show 0/1 and 1/1 for singleton patch with cover letter 2016-08-23T22:59:11+00:00 Jacob Keller jacob.keller@gmail.com 2016-08-23T22:45:50+00:00 957ed3a56c50f5c542e0cac58d75e1d4b9658ac3 Change the default behavior of git-format-patch to generate numbered sequence of 0/1 and 1/1 when generating both a cover-letter and a single patch. This standardizes the cover letter to have 0/N which helps distinguish the cover letter from the patch itself. Since the behavior is easily changed via configuration as well as the use of -n and -N this should be acceptable default behavior. Add tests for the new default behavior. Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 
Change the default behavior of git-format-patch to generate numbered
sequence of 0/1 and 1/1 when generating both a cover-letter and a single
patch. This standardizes the cover letter to have 0/N which helps
distinguish the cover letter from the patch itself. Since the behavior
is easily changed via configuration as well as the use of -n and -N this
should be acceptable default behavior.

Add tests for the new default behavior.

Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
tests: add missing && 2010-11-09T19:59:49+00:00 Jonathan Nieder jrnieder@gmail.com 2010-10-31T01:46:54+00:00 a48fcd836971d065b9bf16b8cd046fd1aff9b279 Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide failures from earlier commands in the chain. Commands intended to fail should be marked with !, test_must_fail, or test_might_fail. The examples in this patch do not require that. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 
Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide
failures from earlier commands in the chain.

Commands intended to fail should be marked with !, test_must_fail, or
test_might_fail.  The examples in this patch do not require that.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Merge branch 'jm/format-patch-no-auto-n-when-k-is-given' 2009-05-23T08:40:22+00:00 Junio C Hamano gitster@pobox.com 2009-05-23T08:40:22+00:00 5781e80ffd4cd0c52cdfbf85cac3bb299544a2fc * jm/format-patch-no-auto-n-when-k-is-given: format-patch let -k override a config-specified format.numbered 
* jm/format-patch-no-auto-n-when-k-is-given:
  format-patch let -k override a config-specified format.numbered
tests: Add tests for missing format-patch long options 2009-05-16T18:47:19+00:00 Stephen Boyd bebarino@gmail.com 2009-05-16T09:24:45+00:00 f044fe2de6f7bbace158853c075a4065f3722265 Exercise format-patch's --signoff, --in-reply-to and --start-number long options. Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 
Exercise format-patch's --signoff, --in-reply-to and --start-number long
options.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
format-patch let -k override a config-specified format.numbered 2009-05-09T15:10:15+00:00 Jim Meyering jim@meyering.net 2009-05-09T08:12:01+00:00 ca6b91d29b7ea937b71f62bf00ba7750f3e594ce Let a command-line --keep-subject (-k) override a config-specified format.numbered (--numbered (-n)), rather than provoking the "-n and -k are mutually exclusive" failure. * t4021-format-patch-numbered.sh: Test for the above Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 
Let a command-line --keep-subject (-k) override a config-specified
format.numbered (--numbered (-n)), rather than provoking the
"-n and -k are mutually exclusive" failure.
* t4021-format-patch-numbered.sh: Test for the above

Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
format-patch: autonumber by default 2008-10-18T14:18:03+00:00 Brian Gernhardt benji@silverinsanity.com 2008-10-02T20:55:39+00:00 a567fdcb016e8e882ec0a1e044c9caac8f70e693 format-patch is most commonly used for multiple patches at once when sending a patchset, in which case we want to number the patches; on the other hand, single patches are not usually expected to be numbered. In other words, the typical behavior expected from format-patch is the one obtained by enabling autonumber, so we set it to be the default. Users that want to disable numbering for a particular patchset can do so with the existing -N command-line switch. Users that want to change the default behavior can use the format.numbering config key. Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Test-updates-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 
format-patch is most commonly used for multiple patches at once when
sending a patchset, in which case we want to number the patches; on
the other hand, single patches are not usually expected to be
numbered.

In other words, the typical behavior expected from format-patch is the
one obtained by enabling autonumber, so we set it to be the default.

Users that want to disable numbering for a particular patchset can do
so with the existing -N command-line switch.  Users that want to
change the default behavior can use the format.numbering config key.

Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com>
Test-updates-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
format-patch: Test --[no-]numbered and format.numbered 2007-11-04T09:26:30+00:00 Brian Gernhardt benji@silverinsanity.com 2007-11-04T05:50:23+00:00 e90ecb68178b41357f40b058aa760c2338974c13 Just because there wasn't a test for --numbered isn't a good reason not to test format.numbered. So now we test both. Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 
Just because there wasn't a test for --numbered isn't a good reason
not to test format.numbered.  So now we test both.

Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>