delta/git.git/t/t5150-request-pull.sh, branch ss/userdiff-update-csharp-java

request-pull: resurrect for-linus -> tags/for-linus DWIM

2014-05-16T17:18:25+00:00

Older versions of Git before v1.7.10 did not DWIM

    $ git pull $URL for-linus

to the tag "tags/for-linus" and the users were required to say

    $ git pull $URL tags/for-linus

instead.  Because newer versions of Git works either way,
request-pull used to show tags/for-linus when asked

    $ git request-pull origin/master $URL for-linus

The recent updates broke this and in the output we see "for-linus"
without the "tags/" prefix.

As v1.7.10 is more than 2 years old, this should matter very little
in practice, but resurrecting it is very simple.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

request-pull: resurrect "pretty refname" feature

2014-02-25T21:45:38+00:00

When asking to fetch/pull a branch whose name is B or a tag whose
name is T, we used to show the command to run as:

	git pull $URL B
        git pull $URL tags/T

even when B and T were spelled in a more qualified way in order to
disambiguate, e.g. heads/B or refs/tags/T, but the recent update
lost this feature.  Resurrect it.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

request-pull: test updates

2014-02-25T20:54:45+00:00

This illustrates behaviour changes that result from the recent
change by Linus.  Most show good changes, but there may be some
usability regressions:

 - The command continues to fail when the user forgot to push out
   before running the command, but the wording of the message has
   been slightly changed.

 - The command no longer guesses when asked to request the commit at
   the HEAD be pulled after pushing it to a branch 'for-upstream',
   even when that branch points at the correct commit.  The user
   must ask the command with the new "master:for-upstream" syntax.

The new behaviour needs to be documented in any case, but we need to
agree what the new behaviour should be before doing so first.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

tests: allow sha1's as part of the path

2013-06-17T19:59:50+00:00

When running 'make test' from a path such as
.../daily-build/master@bdff0e3a374617dce784f801b97500d9ba2e4705, the
logic in fuzz.sed as generated by t5105-request-pull.sh was backwards,
replacing object names before replacing urls, making the test fail.

Signed-off-by: Dennis Kaarsemaker 
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

test: use test_i18ncmp when checking --stat output

2012-03-13T21:26:27+00:00

Ever since v1.7.9.2~13 (2012-02-01), git's diffstat-style summary line
produced by "git apply --stat", "git diff --stat", and "git commit"
varies by locale, producing test failures when GETTEXT_POISON is set.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder 
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

Merge branch 'nd/diffstat-gramnum'

2012-02-13T06:43:19+00:00

* nd/diffstat-gramnum:
  Use correct grammar in diffstat summary line

Use correct grammar in diffstat summary line

2012-02-04T07:19:42+00:00

"git diff --stat" and "git apply --stat" now learn to print the line
"%d files changed, %d insertions(+), %d deletions(-)" in singular form
whenever applicable. "0 insertions" and "0 deletions" are also omitted
unless they are both zero.

This matches how versions of "diffstat" that are not prehistoric produced
their output, and also makes this line translatable.

[jc: with help from Thomas Dickey in archaeology of "diffstat"]
[jc: squashed Jonathan's updates to illustrations in tutorials and a test]

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder 
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

request-pull: explicitly ask tags/$name to be pulled

2012-02-01T05:27:58+00:00

When asking for a tag to be pulled, disambiguate by leaving tags/ prefix
in front of the name of the tag. E.g.

    ... in the git repository at:

      git://example.com/git/git.git/ tags/v1.2.3

    for you to fetch changes up to 123456...

This way, older versions of "git pull" can be used to respond to such a
request more easily, as "git pull $URL v1.2.3" did not DWIM to fetch
v1.2.3 tag in older versions. Also this makes it clearer for humans that
the pull request is made for a tag and he should anticipate a signed one.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

request-pull: do not emit "tag" before the tagname

2011-12-19T19:59:57+00:00

The whole point of the recent update to allow "git pull $url $tagname" is
so that the integrator does not have to store the (signed) tag that is
used to convey authenticity to be recorded in the resulting merge in the
local repository's tag namespace.  Asking for a merge be made with "git
pull $url tag $tagname" defeats it.

Note that the request can become ambiguous if the requestor has a branch
with the same name as the tag, but that is not a new problem limited to
pulling. I wouldn't mind if somebody wants to add disambiguation to the
find_matching_ref logic in the script as a separate patch, though.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

request-pull: update the "pull" command generation logic

2011-12-16T17:25:20+00:00

The old code that insisted on asking for the tip of a branch to be pulled
were not updated when we started allowing for a tag to be pulled. When a
tag points at an older part of the history and there is no branch that
points at the tagged commit, the script failed to say which ref is to be
pulled.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano