It adds a button to the branches page that the user can use to delete
all the branches that are already merged. This can be used to clean up
all the branches that were forgotten to delete while merging MRs.

Fixes #21076.

- Pass `developers_and_merge` and `developers_can_push` in `params`
  instead of using keyword arguments.

- Refactor a slightly complex boolean check to a simple `nil?` check.

1. Previously, we were not removing existing access levels before
   creating new ones. This is not a problem for EE, but _is_ for CE,
   since we restrict the number of access levels in CE to 1.

2. The correct approach is:

    CE -> delete all access levels before updating a protected branch
    EE -> delete developer access levels if "developers_can_{merge,push}" is switched off

3. The dispatch is performed by checking if a "length: 1" validation is
   present on the access levels or not.

4. Another source of problems was that we didn't put multiple queries in
   a transaction. If the `destroy_all` passes, but the `update` fails,
   we should have a rollback.

5. Modifying the API to provide users direct access to CRUD access
   levels will make things a lot simpler.

6. Create `create/update` services separately for this API, which
   perform the necessary data translation, before calling the regular
   `create/update` services. The translation code was getting too large
   for the API endpoint itself, so this move makes sense.

1. `GitPushService` was still using `{merge,push}_access_level_attributes` instead
   of `{merge,push}_access_levels_attributes`.

2. The branches API creates access levels regardless of the state of the
   `developers_can_{push,merge}` parameters. This is in line with the UI,
   where Master access is the default for a new protected branch.

3. Use `after(:build)` to create access levels in the
   `protected_branches` factory, so that `factories_spec` passes. It
   only builds records, so we need to create access levels on `build` as
   well.

1. It makes sense to reuse these constants since we had them duplicated
   in the previous enum implementation. This also simplifies our
   `check_access` implementation, because we can use
   `project.team.max_member_access` directly.

2. Use `accepts_nested_attributes_for` to create push/merge access
   levels. This was a bit fiddly to set up, but this simplifies our code
   by quite a large amount. We can even get rid of
   `ProtectedBranches::BaseService`.

3. Move API handling back into the API (previously in
   `ProtectedBranches::BaseService#translate_api_params`.

4. The protected branch services now return a `ProtectedBranch` rather
   than `true/false`.

5. Run `load_protected_branches` on-demand in the `create` action, to
   prevent it being called unneccessarily.

6. "Masters" is pre-selected as the default option for "Allowed to Push"
   and "Allowed to Merge".

7. These changes were based on a review from @rymai in !5081.

1. The new data model moves from `developers_can_{push,merge}` to
   `allowed_to_{push,merge}`.

2. The API interface has not been changed. It still accepts
   `developers_can_push` and `developers_can_merge` as options. These
   attributes are inferred from the new data model.

3. Modify the protected branch create/update services to translate from
   the API interface to our current data model.