| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes #19514.
Change-Id: I93600d5c3d11ecab5a47dd4cd55ed3aea05e221e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/49611
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The runtime tests may be invoked from a parent that has SIGQUIT
blocked. For example, Java invokes subprocesses this way. In this
situation, TestCrashDumpsAllThreads and TestPanicSystemstack will fail
because they depend on SIGQUIT to get tracebacks, and any subprocess
test that times out will fail to kill the subprocess.
Fix this by detecting if SIGQUIT is blocked and, if so, skipping tests
that depend on it and using SIGKILL to kill timed-out subprocesses.
Based on a fix by Carl Henrik Lunde in
https://golang.org/issue/19196#issuecomment-316145733
Fixes #19196.
Change-Id: Ia20bf15b96086487d0ef6b75239dcc260c21714c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/50330
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If we are using vfork, and if something (such as TSAN) is intercepting
the sigaction function, then we must call the system call, not the
libc function. Otherwise the intercepted sigaction call in the child
may trash the data structures in the parent.
Change-Id: Id9588bfeaa934f32c920bf829c5839be5cacf243
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/50251
Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently we trace mark assists even if they're satisfied entirely by
stealing. This means even if background marking is keeping up with
allocation, we'll still emit a trace event every N bytes of
allocation. The event will be a few microseconds, if that, but they're
frequent enough that, when zoomed out in the trace view, it looks like
all of the time is spent in mark assists even if almost none is.
Change this so we only emit a trace event if the assist actually has
to do assisting. This makes the traces of these events far more
useful.
Change-Id: If4aed1c413b814341ef2fba61d2f10751d00451b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/50030
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
tSweepTerm and pauseStart are supposed to be when STW was triggered,
but right now they're captured a bit before STW. Move these down to
immediately before we trigger STW.
Fixes #19590.
Change-Id: Icd48a5c4d45c9b36187ff986e4f178b5064556c1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/49612
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, Windows stacks are either 128kB or 2MB depending on whether
the binary uses cgo. This is because we assume that Go system stacks
and the small amount of C code invoked by the standard library can
operate within smaller stacks, but general Windows C code assumes
larger stacks.
However, it's easy to call into arbitrary C code using the syscall
package on Windows without ever importing cgo into a binary. Such
binaries need larger system stacks even though they don't use cgo.
Fix this on 64-bit by increasing the system stack size to 2MB always.
This only costs address space, which is free enough on 64-bit to not
worry about. We keep (for now) the existing heuristic on 32-bit, where
address space comes at more of a premium.
Updates #20975.
Change-Id: Iaaaa9a2fcbadc825cddc797aaaea8d34ef8debf2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/49331
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Brainman <alex.brainman@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
kicking off contributing again with a classic
Change-Id: Ifb0aed8f1dc854f85751ce0495967a3c4315128d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/49016
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It seems that when too much other code is running on the system,
the testprogcgo code can overrun its timeouts.
Updates #18598.
Not marking the issue as fixed until it doesn't recur for some time.
Change-Id: Ieaf106b41986fdda76b1d027bb9d5e3fb805cc3b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48233
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
SysV semaphore undo lists should be shared by threads, just like
several other resources listed in cloneFlags. Currently we don't do
this, but it probably doesn't affect anything because 1) probably
nobody uses SysV semaphores from Go and 2) Go-created threads never
exit until the process does. Beyond being the right thing to do,
user-level QEMU requires this flag because it depends on glibc to
create new threads and glibc uses this flag.
Fixes #20763.
Change-Id: I1d1dafec53ed87e0f4d4d432b945e8e68bb72dcd
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48170
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
TestStackGrowth is currently a parallel test. However, it depends on a
20 second timeout, which is already dubious in a parallel test, and
became really problematic on slow builders when runtime.GC switched to
triggering concurrent GC instead of STW GC. Before that change, the
test spent much of its time in STW GC, so it wasn't *really* parallel.
After that change, it was competing with all of the other parallel
tests and GC likely started taking ~4 times longer. On most builders
the whole test runs in well under a second, but on the slow builders
that was enough to push it over the 20 second timeout.
Fix this by making the test serial.
Updates #19381 (probably fixes it, but we'll have to wait and see).
Change-Id: I21af7cf543ab07f1ec1c930bfcb355b0df75672d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48110
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Elias Naur <elias.naur@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The current description refers to the outermost "frame" which can be
misleading. A user reading it can think it means a stack frame.
Change-Id: Ie2c7cb4b4db8f41572df206478ce3b46a0245a5d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47850
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, sysmon waits 60 ms during idle before relaxing. This is
primarily to avoid reducing the precision of short-duration timers. Of
course, if there are no short-duration timers, this wastes 60 ms
running the timer at high resolution.
Improve this by instead inspecting the time until the next timer fires
and relaxing the timer resolution immediately if the next timer won't
fire for a while.
Updates #20937.
Change-Id: If4ad0a565b65a9b3e8c4cdc2eff1486968c79f24
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47833
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, sysmon relaxes the Windows timer resolution as soon as the
Go process becomes idle. However, if it's going idle because of a
short sleep (< 15.6 ms), this can turn that short sleep into a long
sleep (15.6 ms).
To address this, wait for 60 ms of idleness before relaxing the timer
resolution. It would be better to check the time until the next wakeup
and relax immediately if it makes sense, but there's currently no
interaction between sysmon and the timer subsystem, so adding this
simple delay is a much simpler and safer change for late in the
release cycle.
Fixes #20937.
Change-Id: I817db24c3bdfa06dba04b7bc197cfd554363c379
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47832
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
R11 is callee-save in the C ABI, but the temporary register in the Go
ABI. Currently it's being clobbered by runtime.addmoduledata, which
has to follow the C ABI. The observed effect of this was that
dl_open_worker was returning to a bad PC because after it failed to
restore its SP because it was using R11 as a frame pointer.
Fix this by saving R11 around addmoduledata.
Fixes #19674.
Change-Id: Iaacbcc76809a3aa536e9897770831dcbcb6c8245
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47831
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I1c02aa4f7131ae984fda66b32e8a993c0a40b8f4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47690
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently only the rwmutex write lock prevents descheduling. The read
lock does not. This leads to the following situation:
1. A reader acquires the lock and gets descheduled.
2. GOMAXPROCS writers attempt to acquire the lock (or at least one
writer does, followed by readers). This blocks all of the Ps.
3. There is no 3. The descheduled reader never gets to run again
because there are no Ps, so it never releases the lock and the system
deadlocks.
Fix this by preventing descheduling while holding the read lock. This
requires also rewriting TestParallelRWMutexReaders to always create
enough GOMAXPROCS and to use non-blocking operations for
synchronization.
Fixes #20903.
Change-Id: Ibd460663a7e5a555be5490e13b2eaaa295fac39f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47632
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The name LabelList was changed to LabelSet during the development of the
proposal [1], except in one function comment. This commit fixes that.
Fixes #20905.
[1] https://github.com/golang/go/issues/17280
Change-Id: Id4f48d59d7d513fa24b2e42795c2baa5ceb78f36
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47470
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
mheap.allocLarge just calls bestFitTreap and is the only caller of
bestFitTreap. Flatten these into a single function. Also fix their
comments: allocLarge claims to return exactly npages but can in fact
return a larger span, and h.freelarge is not in fact indexed by span
start address.
Change-Id: Ia20112bdc46643a501ea82ea77c58596bc96f125
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47315
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The Func type has allowed calling the Func.Name method on a nil pointer
since Go1.2, where it returned an empty string. A regression caused by
CL/37331 caused this behavior to change. This breaks code that lazily
does runtime.FuncForPC(myPtr).Name() without first checking that myPtr
is actually non-nil.
Fixes #20872
Change-Id: Iae9a2ebabca5e9d1f5a2cdaf2f30e9c6198fec4f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47354
Reviewed-by: Marvin Stenger <marvin.stenger94@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently the execLock is a mutex, which has the unfortunate
side-effect of serializing all thread creation. This replaces it with
an rwmutex so threads can be created in parallel, but exec still
blocks thread creation.
Fixes #20738.
Change-Id: Ia8f30a92053c3d28af460b0da71176abe5fd074b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47072
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently runtime.rwmutex is written to block the calling goroutine
rather than the calling thread. However, rwmutex was intended to be
used in the scheduler, which means it needs to be a thread-level
synchronization primitive.
Hence, this modifies rwmutex to synchronize threads instead of
goroutines. This has the consequence of making it write-barrier-free,
which is also important for using it in the scheduler.
The implementation makes three changes: it replaces the "w" semaphore
with a mutex, since this was all it was being used for anyway; it
replaces "writerSem" with a single pending M that parks on its note;
and it replaces "readerSem" with a list of Ms that park on their notes
plus a pass count that together emulate a counting semaphore. I
model-checked the safety and liveness of this implementation through
>1 billion schedules.
For #20738.
Change-Id: I3cf5a18c266a96a3f38165083812803510217787
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47071
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Updates #20821
Change-Id: I77a5b9a3bbb931845ef52a479549d71069af9540
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46913
Run-TryBot: Shawn Walker-Salas <shawn.walker@oracle.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Updates #18598
Change-Id: I13c60124714cf9d1537efa0a7dd1e6a0fed9ae5b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46723
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When the dedicated mark worker runs, the scheduler won't run on that P
again until GC runs out of mark work. As a result, any goroutines in
that P's local run queue are stranded until another P steals them. In
a normally operating system this may take a long time, and in a 100%
busy system, the scheduler never attempts to steal from another P.
Fix this by draining the local run queue into the global run queue if
the dedicated mark worker has run for long enough. We don't do this
immediately upon scheduling the dedicated mark worker in order to
avoid destroying locality if the mark worker runs for a short time.
Instead, the scheduler delays draining the run queue until the mark
worker gets its first preemption request (and otherwise ignores the
preemption request).
Fixes #20011.
Change-Id: I13067194b2f062b8bdef25cb75e4143b7fb6bb73
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46610
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When Stop is called on a channel, wait until all signals have been
delivered to the channel before returning.
Use atomic operations in sigqueue to communicate more reliably between
the os/signal goroutine and the signal handler.
Fixes #14571
Change-Id: I6c5a9eea1cff85e37a34dffe96f4bb2699e12c6e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46003
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I6265ac81e5c38b201e14ddba2d6b9f0e73d8445c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46310
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I2d0439a9f068e726173afafe2ef1f5d62b7feb4d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46190
Run-TryBot: Mikio Hara <mikioh.mikioh@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Linux's execve has (at the time of writing, and since v2.6.30) a bug when it ran
concurrently with clone, in that it would fail to set up some datastructures if
the thread count before and after some steps differed. This is described better
and in more detail by Colin King in Launchpad¹ and kernel² bugs. When a program
written in Go runtime.Exec's a setuid binary, this issue may cause the resulting
process to not have the expected uid. This patch works around the issue by using
a mutex to serialize exec and clone.
1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1672819
2. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195453
Fixes #19546
Change-Id: I126e87d1d9ce3be5ea4ec9c7ffe13f92e087903d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/43713
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is a runtime version of sync.RWMutex that can be used by code in
the runtime package. The type is not quite the same, in that the zero
value is not valid.
For future use by CL 43713.
Updates #19546
Change-Id: I431eb3688add16ce1274dab97285f555b72735bf
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45991
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
They were failing when run on 32bit RFS, with 32bit gdb.
(mips64 builder now has 64bit RFS, with gdb 7.9.)
Leaving TestGdbPythonCgo disabled, it behaves as described in #18784.
Fixes #18173
Change-Id: I3c438cd5850b7bfd118ac6396f40c1208bac8c2d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45874
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These are used by DIV[U] and MOD[U] assembly instructions.
Add a test in the stdlib so we actually exercise linking
to these routines.
Update #19507
Change-Id: I0d8e19a53e3744abc0c661ea95486f94ec67585e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45703
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Also add runtime· prefixes to the code that is still used.
Fixes #19507
Change-Id: Ib6da6b2a9e398061d3f93958ee1258295b6cc33b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45699
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The test requires pthreads.
Fixes #20666.
Change-Id: Icb2400250a80cdad6680cd1ef6c18ef7343d5e29
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45701
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, semrelease1 readies the next waiter before recording a
mutex event. However, if the next waiter is expecting to look at the
mutex profile, as is the case in TestMutexProfile, this may delay
recording the event too much.
Swap the order of these operations so semrelease1 records the mutex
event before readying the next waiter. This also means readying the
next waiter is the very last thing semrelease1 does, which seems
appropriate.
Fixes #19139.
Change-Id: I1a62063599fdb5d49bd86061a180c0a2d659474b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45751
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Weinberger <pjw@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Block all signals during a fork. In the parent process, after the
fork, restore the signal mask. In the child process, reset all
currently handled signals to the default handler, and then restore the
signal mask.
The effect of this is that the child will be operating using the same
signal regime as the program it is about to exec, as exec resets all
non-ignored signals to the default, and preserves the signal mask.
We do this so that in the case of a signal sent to the process group,
the child process will not try to run a signal handler while in the
precarious state after a fork.
Fixes #18600.
Change-Id: I9f39aaa3884035908d687ee323c975f349d5faaa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45471
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I was surprised to see readvarint show up in a cpu profile.
Use a few simple optimizations to speed up stack copying:
* Avoid making a copy of the cache.entries array or any of its elements.
* Use a shift instead of a signed division in stackmapdata.
* Change readvarint to return the number of bytes consumed
rather than an updated slice.
* Make some minor optimizations to readvarint to help the compiler.
* Avoid called readvarint when the value fits in a single byte.
The first and last optimizations are the most significant,
although they all contribute a little.
Add a benchmark for stack copying that includes lots of different
functions in a recursive loop, to bust the cache.
This might speed up other runtime operations as well;
I only benchmarked stack copying.
name old time/op new time/op delta
StackCopy-8 96.4ms ± 2% 82.7ms ± 1% -14.24% (p=0.000 n=20+19)
StackCopyNoCache-8 167ms ± 1% 131ms ± 1% -21.58% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
Change-Id: I13d5c455c65073c73b656acad86cf8e8e3c9807b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/43150
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are currently two arrays indexed by P ID: allp and pdesc.
Consolidate these by moving the pdesc fields into type p so they can
be indexed off allp along with all other per-P state.
For #15131.
Change-Id: Ib6c4e6e7612281a1171ba4a0d62e52fd59e960b4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45572
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently MaxGomaxprocs is 256. The previous CL saved enough per-P
static space that we can quadruple MaxGomaxprocs (and hence the static
size of allp) and still come out ahead.
This is safe for Go 1.9. In Go 1.10 we'll eliminate the hard-coded
limit entirely.
Updates #15131.
Change-Id: I919ea821c1ce64c27812541dccd7cd7db4122d16
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45673
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Back in the day, allp was just a pointer to an array. As a result, the
runtime has a few loops of the form:
for i := 0; ; i++ {
p := allp[i]
if p == nil {
break
}
...
}
This is silly now because it requires that allp be one longer than the
maximum possible number of Ps, but now that allp is in Go it has a
length.
Replace these with range loops.
Change-Id: I91ef4bc7bd3c9d4fda2264f4aa1b1d0271d7f578
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45571
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Per golang.org/s/generatedcode
Updates #nnn
Change-Id: Ia7513ef6bd26c20b62b57b29f7770684a315d389
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45470
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Layher <mdlayher@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
ARM currently does not use a hardware yield instruction in the spin
loop in procyield because the YIELD instruction was only added in
ARMv6K. However, it appears earlier ARM chips will interpret the YIELD
encoding as an effective NOP (specifically an MSR instruction that
ultimately has no effect on the CPSR register).
Hence, use YIELD in procyield on ARM since it should be, at worst,
harmless.
Fixes #16663.
Change-Id: Id1787ac48862b785b92c28f1ac84cb4908d2173d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45250
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If we're in a situation where printing the fp and sp in the traceback
is useful, it's almost certainly also useful to print the PC.
Change-Id: Ie48a0d5de8a54b5b90ab1d18638a897958e48f70
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45210
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Both runtime.exit and syscall.Exit call Windows ExitProcess.
But recently (CL 34616) runtime.exit was changed to ignore
Windows CreateThread errors if ExitProcess is called.
This CL adjusts syscall.Exit to do the same.
Fixes #18253 (maybe)
Change-Id: I6496c31b01e7c7d73b69c0b2ae33ed7fbe06736b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45115
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This adds diagnostics so we can tell if the finalizer has started, in
addition to whether or not it has finished.
Updates #19381.
Change-Id: Icb7b1b0380c9ad1128b17074828945511a6cca5d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45138
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
runtime.GC no longer triggers a STW GC. This fixes the description of
GODEBUG=gctrace=1 so it doesn't claim otherwise.
Change-Id: Ibd34a55c5ae7b5eda5c2393b9a6674bdf1d51eb3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45131
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I78c6198eb909e679cf0f776b77dda52211bfd347
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45133
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The current implementation of "goroutine N cmd" assumes it can get
goroutine N's state from the goroutine's sched buffer. But this only
works if the goroutine is blocked. Extend find_goroutine so that, if
there is no saved scheduler state for a goorutine, it tries to find
the thread the goroutine is running on and use the thread's current
register state. We also extend find_goroutine to understand saved
syscall register state.
Fixes #13887.
Change-Id: I739008a8987471deaa4a9da918655e4042cf969b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45031
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently the extra Ms created for cgo callbacks have a corresponding
G that's kept in syscall state with only a call to goexit on its
stack. This leads to confusing output from runtime.NumGoroutines and
in tracebacks:
goroutine 17 [syscall, locked to thread]:
runtime.goexit()
.../src/runtime/asm_amd64.s:2197 +0x1
Fix this by putting this goroutine into state _Gdead when it's not in
use instead of _Gsyscall. To keep the goroutine counts correct, we
also add one to sched.ngsys while the goroutine is in _Gdead. The
effect of this is as if the goroutine simply doesn't exist when it's
not in use.
Fixes #16631.
Fixes #16714.
Change-Id: Ieae08a2febd4b3d00bef5c23fd6ca88fb2bb0087
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45030
Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The test is inherently racy, and for me fails about 0.05% of the time.
So only fail the test if it fails ten times in a row.
Fixes #20594
Change-Id: I3b3f7598f2196f7406f1a3937f38f21ff0c0e4b5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45020
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For cgo programs on linux-amd64 we call the C function mmap.
This supports programs such as the C memory sanitizer that need to
intercept all calls to mmap. It turns out that there are programs that
intercept both mmap and munmap, or that at least expect that if they
intercept mmap, they also intercept munmap. So, if we permit mmap
to be intercepted, also permit munmap to be intercepted.
No test, as it requires two odd things: a C program that intercepts
mmap and munmap, and a Go program that calls munmap.
Change-Id: Iec33f47d59f70dbb7463fd12d30728c24cd4face
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45016
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
|