delta/openstack/python-openstackclient.git - opendev.org: openstack/python-openstackclient

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
...
* \| \| \| \| \| \|	Support "network delete" command in nova network	Tang Chen	2016-02-14	4	-6/+64
\|/ / / / / / \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	"network delete" command is not implemented in nova network. This patch implements it. Change-Id: I5dac1eed6eb8e67298bb446418835a6ab85c859c Depends-On: I1b59264cd40aaf1062f4e8db233ccb7fd0e95f0e partial-Bug: 1543672
* \| \| \| \| \|	Floating IP: Neutron support for "ip floating list" command	Tang Chen	2016-02-14	5	-19/+107
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Change-Id: I253f66f6bc64470e1a18ffea506048eb53f67d5c partial-Bug: 1519502 Related-to: blueprint neutron-client
* \| \| \| \| \|	Floating IP: Neutron support for "ip floating delete" command	Jude Job	2016-02-14	7	-33/+231
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	This patch implements "ip floating delete" command for both compute and network. Also includes unit tests. Change-Id: Ie61f0faad65ec90f9d9956ae463412be8d963d05 partial-Bug: 1519502 Related-to: blueprint neutron-client Co-Authored-By: Tang Chen <chen.tang@easystack.cn>
* \| \| \| \| \|	Merge "Add quota functional tests"	Jenkins	2016-02-13	2	-0/+43
\|\ \ \ \ \ \
\| * \| \| \| \| \|	Add quota functional tests	Richard Theis	2016-02-12	2	-0/+43
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Add functional tests for "os quota" commands. Change-Id: I0f5939bf4ce553174c9b7ce55bdb3dce0506c409 Related-Bug: #1528249 Partially-Implements: blueprint neutron-client
* \| \| \| \| \| \|	Merge "Identity: Fix DisplayCommandBase comments for cliff ShowOne subclass ↵	Jenkins	2016-02-13	17	-75/+225
\|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	tests"
\| * \| \| \| \| \| \|	Identity: Fix DisplayCommandBase comments for cliff ShowOne subclass tests	Tang Chen	2016-02-10	17	-75/+225
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	As bug #1477199 describes, the wrong comment below is all over the unit test code of OSC. # DisplayCommandBase.take_action() returns two tuples There is no such class named DisplayCommandBase in OSC. It is in cliff. All OSC command classes inherit from the base classes in cliff, class Command, class Lister and class ShowOne. It is like this: Object \|--> Command \|--> DisplayCommandBase \|--> Lister \|--> ShowOne take_action() is an abstract method of class Command, and generally is overwritten by subclasses. * Command.take_action() returns nothing. * Lister.take_action() returns a tuple which contains a tuple of columns and a generator used to generate the data. * ShowOne.take_action() returns an iterator which contains a tuple of columns and a tuple of data. So, this problem should be fixed in 3 steps: 1. Remove all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class Command in cliff as it returns nothing. 2. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class Lister in cliff. Lister.take_action() returns a tuple and a generator. 3. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class ShowOne in cliff. ShowOne.take_action() returns two tuples. This patch finishes step 3 in all identity tests. Change-Id: I1f05e833cdacd30915954e4220b6e1f16ac1ed40 Closes-bug: #1477199
* \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Merge "Identity: Fix DisplayCommandBase comments for cliff Lister subclass ↵	Jenkins	2016-02-13	21	-56/+168
\|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \| \|/ / / / / / / \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	tests"
\| * \| \| \| \| \| \|	Identity: Fix DisplayCommandBase comments for cliff Lister subclass tests	Tang Chen	2016-02-10	21	-56/+168
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	As bug #1477199 describes, the wrong comment below is all over the unit test code of OSC. # DisplayCommandBase.take_action() returns two tuples There is no such class named DisplayCommandBase in OSC. It is in cliff. All OSC command classes inherit from the base classes in cliff, class Command, class Lister and class ShowOne. It is like this: Object \|--> Command \|--> DisplayCommandBase \|--> Lister \|--> ShowOne take_action() is an abstract method of class Command, and generally is overwritten by subclasses. * Command.take_action() returns nothing. * Lister.take_action() returns a tuple which contains a tuple of columns and a generator used to generate the data. * ShowOne.take_action() returns an iterator which contains a tuple of columns and a tuple of data. So, this problem should be fixed in 3 steps: 1. Remove all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class Command in cliff as it returns nothing. 2. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class Lister in cliff. Lister.take_action() returns a tuple and a generator. 3. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class ShowOne in cliff. ShowOne.take_action() returns two tuples. This patch finishes step 2 in all identity tests. Change-Id: I2929ee688b1d7afc52c6ab325982bdc24c60a995 Partial-bug: #1477199
* \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Merge "Identity: Fix DisplayCommandBase comments for cliff Command subclass ↵	Jenkins	2016-02-13	6	-27/+0
\|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \| \|/ / / / / / / \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	tests"
\| * \| \| \| \| \| \|	Identity: Fix DisplayCommandBase comments for cliff Command subclass tests	Tang Chen	2016-02-10	6	-27/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	As bug #1477199 describes, the wrong comment below is all over the unit test code of OSC. # DisplayCommandBase.take_action() returns two tuples There is no such class named DisplayCommandBase in OSC. It is in cliff. All OSC command classes inherit from the base classes in cliff, class Command, class Lister and class ShowOne. It is like this: Object \|--> Command \|--> DisplayCommandBase \|--> Lister \|--> ShowOne take_action() is an abstract method of class Command, and generally is overwritten by subclasses. * Command.take_action() returns nothing. * Lister.take_action() returns a tuple which contains a tuple of columns and a generator used to generate the data. * ShowOne.take_action() returns an iterator which contains a tuple of columns and a tuple of data. So, this problem should be fixed in 3 steps: 1. Remove all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class Command in cliff as it returns nothing. 2. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class Lister in cliff. Lister.take_action() returns a tuple and a generator. 3. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class ShowOne in cliff. ShowOne.take_action() returns two tuples. This patch finishes step 1 in all identity tests. Change-Id: Id7180d10c050c6286b2c05cd990e2e275fbc3d38 Partial-bug: #1477199
* \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Merge "Add NetworkAndCompute Lister and ShowOne classes"	Jenkins	2016-02-13	2	-27/+193
\|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\| * \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Add NetworkAndCompute Lister and ShowOne classes	Richard Theis	2016-02-12	2	-27/+193
\| \| \|/ / / / / / \| \|/\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	This patch set introduces the NetworkAndComputeLister and NetworkAndComputeShowOne classes which are related to the NetworkAndComputeCommand class. These classes are for commands that must support neutron and nova network. The new classes allows both the parser and actions to be unique. Change-Id: I1b59264cd40aaf1062f4e8db233ccb7fd0e95f0e Partial-Bug: #1519511 Partial-Bug: #1519512 Related-to: blueprint neutron-client
* \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Merge "Trivial: Fix a typo in test_network.py"	Jenkins	2016-02-13	1	-1/+1
\|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\| * \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Trivial: Fix a typo in test_network.py	Tang Chen	2016-02-11	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Change-Id: I5fe4865473ea885b54d02b5d174a632221f815c8
* \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Merge "Updated from global requirements"	Jenkins	2016-02-13	1	-1/+1
\|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \| \|_\|_\|_\|_\|/ / / / \|/\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|
\| * \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Updated from global requirements	OpenStack Proposal Bot	2016-02-12	1	-1/+1
\| \| \|/ / / / / / \| \|/\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Change-Id: I1583731e73699b71aa7a03ae4541e481abd6f1ea
* \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Merge "Add release note for custom logging feature"	Jenkins	2016-02-12	1	-0/+5
\|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\| * \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Add release note for custom logging feature	Terry Howe	2016-02-07	1	-0/+5
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Change-Id: I5471fcb33cd4488b33d2c01d857344f52f361c9d
* \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Merge "Allow custom log levels for other loggers"	Jenkins	2016-02-12	1	-9/+37
\|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \| \|/ / / / / / / / \| \| / / / / / / / \| \|/ / / / / / / \|/\| \| \| \| \| \| \|
\| * \| \| \| \| \| \|	Allow custom log levels for other loggers	TerryHowe	2016-02-05	1	-9/+37
\| \| \|_\|/ / / / \| \|/\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	It would be convenient to be able to enable special logging for various components that openstack uses. The biggest thing is the --debug prints a lot of information when often all I want to see is the outgoing requests/responses. To get just that logged you would put this in your clouds.yaml: logging: keystoneclient.session: debug Closes-Bug: #1484660 Change-Id: I15c2607e8262f10903dd831ee8622fb5d6315310
* \| \| \| \| \| \|	Merge "Trivial: Fix "abstractmethod" to "abstract method""	Jenkins	2016-02-12	6	-24/+24
\|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \| \| \|_\|/ / / / \| \|/\| \| \| \| \|
\| * \| \| \| \| \|	Trivial: Fix "abstractmethod" to "abstract method"	Tang Chen	2016-02-10	6	-24/+24
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	As Richard <rtheis@us.ibm.com> has pointed out, "abstractmethod" should be "abstract method". This is a small typo I have made when I fix DisplayCommandBase comment bug. Change-Id: I84f1a3158896257686a0a7efa1123eef1b85139f Partial-bug: #1477199
* \| \| \| \| \| \|	Merge "Fix identity test_role functional tests"	Jenkins	2016-02-12	2	-2/+2
\|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \| \|_\|_\|/ / / / \|/\| \| \| \| \| \|
\| * \| \| \| \| \|	Fix identity test_role functional tests	Richard Theis	2016-02-11	2	-2/+2
\| \| \|_\|/ / / \| \|/\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	A recent keystone change [1] resulted in the domain_id field being included when showing a role. [1] https://github.com/openstack/keystone/commit/407eabde417e85bb35bc7cbf1995857f4b20aeca Change-Id: I344f4d727f2a16217c075ad8b8393c1e0a233c2e Closes-Bug: #1544547
* \| \| \| \| \|	Updated from global requirements	OpenStack Proposal Bot	2016-02-10	2	-2/+2
\| \|/ / / / \|/\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Change-Id: Icdee08fa079eb3646388567050643c29eac1eca8
* \| \| \| \|	Fix DisplayCommandBase comments for cliff ShowOne subclass tests	Tang Chen	2016-02-10	8	-30/+90
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	As bug #1477199 describes, the wrong comment below is all over the unit test code of OSC. # DisplayCommandBase.take_action() returns two tuples There is no such class named DisplayCommandBase in OSC. It is in cliff. All OSC command classes inherit from the base classes in cliff, class Command, class Lister and class ShowOne. It is like this: Object \|--> Command \|--> DisplayCommandBase \|--> Lister \|--> ShowOne take_action() is an abstract method of class Command, and generally is overwritten by subclasses. * Command.take_action() returns nothing. * Lister.take_action() returns a tuple which contains a tuple of columns and a generator used to generate the data. * ShowOne.take_action() returns an iterator which contains a tuple of columns and a tuple of data. So, this problem should be fixed in 3 steps: 1. Remove all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class Command in cliff as it returns nothing. 2. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class Lister in cliff. Lister.take_action() returns a tuple and a generator. 3. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class ShowOne in cliff. ShowOne.take_action() returns two tuples. This patch finishes step 3 in all but identity tests. There are too many such comments in identity tests. So fix them all in another patch. Change-Id: I1afe4852069d25d562a9448ec2bf2cff58955052 Partial-bug: #1477199
* \| \| \| \|	Fix DisplayCommandBase comments for cliff Lister subclass tests	Tang Chen	2016-02-09	11	-46/+138
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	As bug #1477199 describes, the wrong comment below is all over the unit test code of OSC. # DisplayCommandBase.take_action() returns two tuples There is no such class named DisplayCommandBase in OSC. It is in cliff. All OSC command classes inherit from the base classes in cliff, class Command, class Lister and class ShowOne. It is like this: Object \|--> Command \|--> DisplayCommandBase \|--> Lister \|--> ShowOne take_action() is an abstract method of class Command, and generally is overwritten by subclasses. * Command.take_action() returns nothing. * Lister.take_action() returns a tuple which contains a tuple of columns and a generator used to generate the data. * ShowOne.take_action() returns an iterator which contains a tuple of columns and a tuple of data. So, this problem should be fixed in 3 steps: 1. Remove all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class Command in cliff as it returns nothing. 2. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class Lister in cliff. Lister.take_action() returns a tuple and a generator. 3. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class ShowOne in cliff. ShowOne.take_action() returns two tuples. This patch finishes step 2 in all but identity tests. There are too many such comments in identity tests. So fix them all in another patch. Change-Id: I00f38d12f55abe20fa708f6349073da658622f8d Partial-bug: #1477199
* \| \| \| \|	Fix DisplayCommandBase comments for cliff Command subclass tests	Tang Chen	2016-02-09	3	-22/+0
\|/ / / / \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	As bug #1477199 describes, the wrong comment below is all over the unit test code of OSC. # DisplayCommandBase.take_action() returns two tuples There is no such class named DisplayCommandBase in OSC. It is in cliff. All OSC command classes inherit from the base classes in cliff, class Command, class Lister and class ShowOne. It is like this: Object \|--> Command \|--> DisplayCommandBase \|--> Lister \|--> ShowOne take_action() is an abstract method of class Command, and generally is overwritten by subclasses. * Command.take_action() returns nothing. * Lister.take_action() returns a tuple which contains a tuple of columns and a generator used to generate the data. * ShowOne.take_action() returns an iterator which contains a tuple of columns and a tuple of data. So, this problem should be fixed in 3 steps: 1. Remove all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class Command in cliff as it returns nothing. 2. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class Lister in cliff. Lister.take_action() returns a tuple and a generator. 3. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class ShowOne in cliff. ShowOne.take_action() returns two tuples. This patch finishes step 1 in all but identity tests. There are too many such comments in identity tests. So fix them all in another patch. Change-Id: I9849baa8141ea8af2042a69afd540b77ce6ae6bd Partial-bug: #1477199
* \| \| \|	Merge "Compute: Fix DisplayCommandBase comments for cliff ShowOne subclass ↵	Jenkins	2016-02-08	3	-12/+36
\|\ \ \ \ \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	tests"
\| * \| \| \|	Compute: Fix DisplayCommandBase comments for cliff ShowOne subclass tests	Tang Chen	2016-02-06	3	-12/+36
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	As bug #1477199 describes, the wrong comment below is all over the unit test code of OSC. # DisplayCommandBase.take_action() returns two tuples There is no such class named DisplayCommandBase in OSC. It is in cliff. All OSC command classes inherit from the base classes in cliff, class Command, class Lister and class ShowOne. It is like this: Object \|--> Command \|--> DisplayCommandBase \|--> Lister \|--> ShowOne take_action() is an abstract method of class Command, and generally is overwritten by subclasses. * Command.take_action() returns nothing. * Lister.take_action() returns a tuple which contains a tuple of columns and a generator used to generate the data. * ShowOne.take_action() returns an iterator which contains a tuple of columns and a tuple of data So, this problem should be fixed in 3 steps: 1. Remove all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class Command in cliff as it returns nothing. 2. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class Lister in cliff. Lister.take_action() returns a tuple and a generator. 3. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class ShowOne in cliff. ShowOne.take_action() returns two tuples. This patch finishes step 3 in compute tests. Change-Id: I4df224ec82b5d82a3d6d3f366c0f68a7ea0d87cd Partial-bug: #1477199
* \| \| \| \|	Merge "Compute: Fix DisplayCommandBase comments for cliff Lister subclass tests"	Jenkins	2016-02-08	4	-9/+27
\|\ \ \ \ \ \| \|/ / / /
\| * \| \| \|	Compute: Fix DisplayCommandBase comments for cliff Lister subclass tests	Tang Chen	2016-02-06	4	-9/+27
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	As bug #1477199 describes, the wrong comment below is all over the unit test code of OSC. # DisplayCommandBase.take_action() returns two tuples There is no such class named DisplayCommandBase in OSC. It is in cliff. All OSC command classes inherit from the base classes in cliff, class Command, class Lister and class ShowOne. It is like this: Object \|--> Command \|--> DisplayCommandBase \|--> Lister \|--> ShowOne take_action() is an abstract method of class Command, and generally is overwritten by subclasses. * Command.take_action() returns nothing. * Lister.take_action() returns a tuple which contains a tuple of columns and a generator used to generate the data. * ShowOne.take_action() returns an iterator which contains a tuple of columns and a tuple of data So, this problem should be fixed in 3 steps: 1. Remove all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class Command in cliff as it returns nothing. 2. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class Lister in cliff. Lister.take_action() returns a tuple and a generator. 3. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class ShowOne in cliff. ShowOne.take_action() returns two tuples. This patch finishes step 2 in compute tests. Change-Id: Idc54ad21eaa1371ebd601327b8d962c7039f2de0 Partial-bug: #1477199
* \| \| \| \|	Merge "Compute: Fix DisplayCommandBase comments for cliff Command subclass ↵	Jenkins	2016-02-08	2	-10/+0
\|\ \ \ \ \ \| \|/ / / / \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	tests"
\| * \| \| \|	Compute: Fix DisplayCommandBase comments for cliff Command subclass tests	Tang Chen	2016-02-06	2	-10/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	As bug #1477199 describes, the wrong comment below is all over the unit test code of OSC. # DisplayCommandBase.take_action() returns two tuples There is no such class named DisplayCommandBase in OSC. It is in cliff. All OSC command classes inherit from the base classes in cliff, class Command, class Lister and class ShowOne. It is like this: Object \|--> Command \|--> DisplayCommandBase \|--> Lister \|--> ShowOne take_action() is an abstract method of class Command, and generally is overwritten by subclasses. * Command.take_action() returns nothing. * Lister.take_action() returns a tuple which contains a tuple of columns and a generator used to generate the data. * ShowOne.take_action() returns an iterator which contains a tuple of columns and a tuple of data So, this problem should be fixed in 3 steps: 1. Remove all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class Command in cliff as it returns nothing. 2. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class Lister in cliff. Lister.take_action() returns a tuple and a generator. 3. Fix all DisplayCommandBase comments for tests of classes inheriting from class ShowOne in cliff. ShowOne.take_action() returns two tuples. This patch finishes step 1 in compute tests. Change-Id: I99ab42a7de69af0e5de802a1bb5aac647245a200 Partial-bug: #1477199
* \| \| \| \|	Merge "Add unit tests for "hypervisor show" command"	Jenkins	2016-02-08	2	-0/+131
\|\ \ \ \ \
\| * \| \| \| \|	Add unit tests for "hypervisor show" command	Tang Chen	2016-02-07	2	-0/+131
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Change-Id: Ib75e5eb5b197e9d58fb87a595a43b8774b7b1987
* \| \| \| \| \|	Merge "Remove identity_client.projects definition in TestSecurityGroup"	Jenkins	2016-02-08	1	-4/+2
\|\ \ \ \ \ \
\| * \| \| \| \| \|	Remove identity_client.projects definition in TestSecurityGroup	Tang Chen	2016-02-06	1	-4/+2
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	projects mock has been defined in FakeIdentityv2Client as tenants, and in FakeIdentityv3Client as projects. No need to define them again. Change-Id: Ieb97b32d7be6bd95c8621092b218ebfd8bc5b78d
* \| \| \| \| \| \|	Merge "Define security_group_rules mock in FakeComputev2Client"	Jenkins	2016-02-08	2	-5/+6
\|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \| \|/ / / / / /
\| * \| \| \| \| \|	Define security_group_rules mock in FakeComputev2Client	Tang Chen	2016-02-06	2	-5/+6
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	security_group_rules mock should be defined in FakeComputev2Client, and used in each test class. Change-Id: I44bb6379b2c1b6cb277296e08e25dd4d7255c276
* \| \| \| \| \| \|	Merge "Move security_groups mock definition to FakeComputev2Client"	Jenkins	2016-02-08	3	-6/+18
\|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \| \|/ / / / / /
\| * \| \| \| \| \|	Move security_groups mock definition to FakeComputev2Client	Tang Chen	2016-02-06	3	-6/+18
\| \| \|/ / / / \| \|/\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	All compute client related mocks should be defined in FakeComputev2Client. Change-Id: Ie75385af772ca23286c4cf131d3d54cc14f20a30
* \| \| \| \| \|	Updated from global requirements	OpenStack Proposal Bot	2016-02-08	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Change-Id: I14a68f0ed63f1a3e3cac7379324d58b613afdfa9
* \| \| \| \| \|	Merge "Add release note for recursive delete"	Jenkins	2016-02-07	1	-0/+5
\|\ \ \ \ \ \
\| * \| \| \| \| \|	Add release note for recursive delete	Terry Howe	2016-02-07	1	-0/+5
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Change-Id: I9c7a32d4e18f32ae1225e250d11b8e0a2d274dd7
* \| \| \| \| \| \|	Merge "Fix formatting in release 2.0.0 notes"	Jenkins	2016-02-06	5	-10/+12
\|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \| \|_\|_\|/ / / / \|/\| \| \| \| \| \|
\| * \| \| \| \| \|	Fix formatting in release 2.0.0 notes	Dean Troyer	2016-02-05	5	-10/+12
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	This is a test to see if we can update release notes from previous releases. This may not work and will be abandoned if so. Change-Id: Id85a25c793aa403025c7e32038ea7072139700db
* \| \| \| \| \| \|	Merge "Fix some release note formatting"	Jenkins	2016-02-06	4	-8/+8
\|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \| \|/ / / / / / \| \| \| / / / / \| \|_\|/ / / / \|/\| \| \| \| \|
\| * \| \| \| \|	Fix some release note formatting	Dean Troyer	2016-02-05	4	-8/+8
\| \| \|/ / / \| \|/\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Fix the current notes that used single-backticks where double-backticks should have been used. Change-Id: I454e14dd084c9b706fab3255170a79765091a497