diff options
-rw-r--r-- | doc/trouble.rst | 21 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/doc/trouble.rst b/doc/trouble.rst index df43f37f..bfdf12bb 100644 --- a/doc/trouble.rst +++ b/doc/trouble.rst @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ Things that cause trouble ========================= .. :history: 20121231T085200, brand new docs. +.. :history: 20150124T160800, remove obsolete stuff. + Coverage works well, and I want it to properly measure any Python program, but there are some situations it can't cope with. This page details some known @@ -36,10 +38,6 @@ coverage.py from working properly: processes don't get measured by coverage.py. Some possible fixes are discussed or linked to in `issue 117`_. -* `gevent`_, which is based on `greenlet`_, and is similar to `eventlet`_. All - of these manipulate the C stack, and therefore confuse coverage.py. - `Issue 149`_ has some pointers to more information. - * `thread`_, in the Python standard library, is the low-level threading interface. Threads created with this module will not be traced. Use the higher-level `threading`_ module instead. @@ -51,15 +49,11 @@ coverage.py from working properly: .. _execv: http://docs.python.org/library/os#os.execl .. _multiprocessing: http://docs.python.org/library/multiprocessing.html -.. _gevent: http://www.gevent.org/ -.. _greenlet: http://greenlet.readthedocs.org/ -.. _eventlet: http://eventlet.net/ .. _sys.settrace: http://docs.python.org/library/sys.html#sys.settrace .. _thread: http://docs.python.org/library/thread.html .. _threading: http://docs.python.org/library/threading.html .. _issue 43: https://bitbucket.org/ned/coveragepy/issue/43/coverage-measurement-fails-on-code .. _issue 117: https://bitbucket.org/ned/coveragepy/issue/117/enable-coverage-measurement-of-code-run-by -.. _issue 149: https://bitbucket.org/ned/coveragepy/issue/149/coverage-gevent-looks-broken Things that require --timid @@ -77,17 +71,6 @@ timid=True`` configuration option. .. _TurboGears: http://turbogears.org/ -Really obscure things ---------------------- - -* Python 2.5 had a bug (`1569356`_) that could make your program behave - differently when being measured with coverage. This is diagnosed in - `issue 51`_. - -.. _issue 51: http://bitbucket.org/ned/coveragepy/issue/51/turbogears-15-test-failing-with-coverage -.. _1569356: http://bugs.python.org/issue1569356 - - Still having trouble? --------------------- |