From bb205151b73def287a34ac059d445470f1e1c2a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: goodger <goodger@929543f6-e4f2-0310-98a6-ba3bd3dd1d04>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 13:26:14 +0000
Subject: updated

git-svn-id: http://svn.code.sf.net/p/docutils/code/trunk@1545 929543f6-e4f2-0310-98a6-ba3bd3dd1d04
---
 docutils/docs/dev/todo.txt | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)

(limited to 'docutils/docs/dev')

diff --git a/docutils/docs/dev/todo.txt b/docutils/docs/dev/todo.txt
index 0d937e255..96650ea7b 100644
--- a/docutils/docs/dev/todo.txt
+++ b/docutils/docs/dev/todo.txt
@@ -831,6 +831,27 @@ __ rst/alternatives.html#or-not-to-do
   parse nested inline markup somehow?  See the `collected notes
   <http://docutils.sf.net/spec/rst/alternatives.html#nested-inline-markup>`__.
 
+* Idea from Beni Cherniavsky::
+
+      I'm writing a README document linking to all other interesting
+      files in its directory.  If these were full URLs I could just
+      write them in the text but these are relative links that can't
+      be auto-recognized.  The shortest way to make such links that I
+      found was `file_name <file_name>`_.  Perhaps a shortcut for such
+      usage could be added, e.g.  `<file_name>`_ would take the target
+      as the link name?
+
+  IOW these would be equivalent::
+
+      `<file_name>`_
+      `file_name <file_name>`_
+
+  Another possibility is to drop the backticks.  Should the angle
+  brackets be kept in the output or not?  This syntax could be adopted
+  in addition to the one above::
+
+      <file_name>_
+
 
 Directives
 ``````````
-- 
cgit v1.2.1