| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Needs plenty of work
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
optimal results in all cases (at least the ones I can test)
pack: now works properly with a sliding memory manager
test_packedodb_pure: fixed very memory hungry implementation by using an iterator. This will of course reduce the measured performance a bit, but 750MB of memory is just a little bit too much for an ordinary test. Maybe it would be alright to just reduce the number of items ... but performance isn't a strength of python after all
|
|
|
|
| |
pack: now using the global sliding memory manager. The current implementation uses assumes that packs are small enough to fit into memory right away, where the window size will be about 1 GB, as it never calls use_window() to assure the required offset actually exists. It will need to change to set the window appropriately.
|
| |
|
|
Then the tests will need some work
|