summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/source/reference/routines.emath.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNathaniel J. Smith <njs@pobox.com>2015-10-04 17:22:51 -0700
committerNathaniel J. Smith <njs@pobox.com>2015-10-04 17:22:51 -0700
commitc74001edb7294cd4eca949162c07844a7b2676a5 (patch)
tree98ea3219fde2a674cdfd26b1e4c0867bbb923b91 /doc/source/reference/routines.emath.rst
parent365a7477a18d28c7d0fca002bcca575e928efd54 (diff)
downloadnumpy-c74001edb7294cd4eca949162c07844a7b2676a5.tar.gz
DEV: for new council members, clarify order of voting and talking to them
Original text seemed to imply that we would always ask the potential new Council Member whether they were interested *before* we actually decided whether to offer them a spot, which could create a sticky situation if someone ever got voted down. Rephrase to make clear that things do not have to occur in this order.
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/source/reference/routines.emath.rst')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions