summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--doc/source/dev/governance/governance.rst8
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/doc/source/dev/governance/governance.rst b/doc/source/dev/governance/governance.rst
index 6134e1bfd..e558eb29c 100644
--- a/doc/source/dev/governance/governance.rst
+++ b/doc/source/dev/governance/governance.rst
@@ -84,10 +84,10 @@ The mechanism we use to accomplish this goal may be unfamiliar for those
who are not experienced with the cultural norms around free/open-source
software development. We provide a summary here, and highly recommend
that all Contributors additionally read `Chapter 4: Social and Political
-Infrastructure <http://producingoss.com/en/producingoss.html#social-infrastructure>`__
+Infrastructure <http://producingoss.com/en/producingoss.html#social-infrastructure>`_
of Karl Fogel's classic *Producing Open Source Software*, and in
particular the section on `Consensus-based
-Democracy <http://producingoss.com/en/producingoss.html#consensus-democracy>`__,
+Democracy <http://producingoss.com/en/producingoss.html#consensus-democracy>`_,
for a more detailed discussion.
In this context, consensus does *not* require:
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ few days, then it's probably fine. And worst case, if a change is more
controversial than expected, or a crucial critique is delayed because
someone was on vacation, then it's no big deal: we apologize for
misjudging the situation, `back up, and sort things
-out <http://producingoss.com/en/producingoss.html#version-control-relaxation>`__.
+out <http://producingoss.com/en/producingoss.html#version-control-relaxation>`_.
If one does need to invoke a formal veto, then it should consist of:
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ Council decision making
If it becomes necessary for the Steering Council to produce a formal
decision, then they will use a form of the `Apache Foundation voting
-process <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html>`__. This is a
+process <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html>`_. This is a
formalized version of consensus, in which +1 votes indicate agreement,
-1 votes are vetoes (and must be accompanied with a rationale, as
above), and one can also vote fractionally (e.g. -0.5, +0.5) if one