From 27e67ce1d2cdf85f29e05b88131731b93673e57c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Andreas Entschev Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 22:51:02 +0100 Subject: NEP: NEP-35 phrasing fix Co-authored-by: Sebastian Berg --- doc/neps/nep-0035-array-creation-dispatch-with-array-function.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'doc/neps/nep-0035-array-creation-dispatch-with-array-function.rst') diff --git a/doc/neps/nep-0035-array-creation-dispatch-with-array-function.rst b/doc/neps/nep-0035-array-creation-dispatch-with-array-function.rst index 6d1f8bf27..5ec01081a 100644 --- a/doc/neps/nep-0035-array-creation-dispatch-with-array-function.rst +++ b/doc/neps/nep-0035-array-creation-dispatch-with-array-function.rst @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ backend type: type(np.asarray([1, 2, 3], like=da.array(cp.array(()))).compute()) Note how above the array is backed by ``chunktype=cupy.ndarray``, and the -resulting array after computing it is also a ``cupy.ndarray``. If Dask does +resulting array after computing it is also a ``cupy.ndarray``. If Dask did not use the ``like=`` argument via the ``self`` attribute from ``__array_function__``, the example above would be backed by ``numpy.ndarray`` instead: -- cgit v1.2.1