From de719936cf64df1a8f1096fb7f3a2be720906da4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Wiebe <mwiebe@enthought.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 12:20:52 -0500
Subject: ENH: datetime: Remove TimeInteger, partially fix up datetime array
 printing

The TimeInteger seemed like the wrong abstraction to me. Timedelta
is reasonable as an integer, and in fact if NumPy supported arbitrary
unit metadata, Timedelta could be removed and that mechanism used
instead. Datetime, however, doesn't represent an integer. Datetime
has no zero (barring big bang, God's creation, or some other choice...),
something which integers definitely have.
---
 numpy/core/numeric.py | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'numpy/core/numeric.py')

diff --git a/numpy/core/numeric.py b/numpy/core/numeric.py
index 55ab74168..67235e4d1 100644
--- a/numpy/core/numeric.py
+++ b/numpy/core/numeric.py
@@ -1332,7 +1332,7 @@ def array_repr(arr, max_line_width=None, precision=None, suppress_small=None):
     if typeless and arr.size:
         return cName + "(%s)" % lst
     else:
-        typename=arr.dtype.name
+        typename="'%s'" % arr.dtype.name
         lf = ''
         if issubclass(arr.dtype.type, flexible):
             if arr.dtype.names:
-- 
cgit v1.2.1