| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | Non-numeric 'iat' now raises InvalidIssuedAtError on decode()190-remove-iat-verification | Mark Adams | 2017-04-17 | 1 | -0/+2 |
| | | |||||
| * | Stop rejecting tokens with future 'iat' values | Mark Adams | 2017-04-17 | 1 | -3/+0 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | RFC 7519 does not specify or even suggest this type of validation on the 'iat' claim and it has caused issues for several consumers of PyJWT. This change removes the validation on future 'iat' values and leaves such things up to the application developer to implement. Fixes #190. | ||||
| * | Be specific for Python2 and Python3 | David Binetti | 2017-03-28 | 1 | -3/+11 |
| | | |||||
| * | Update FAQ to clarify Python2/3 differences | David Binetti | 2017-03-28 | 1 | -0/+5 |
| | | |||||
| * | Fix typo in rst | Michael Collis | 2016-09-21 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | |||||
| * | Fix imports in code example | Matti John | 2015-11-11 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| | | |||||
| * | Added docs/ with awesome new documentation 🎉 | Mark Adams | 2015-10-23 | 8 | -0/+909 |
