delta/python-packages/qpid-python.git/qpid/java/systests, branch help

QPID-3142: remove incorrectly added wrapping check on alternative cleanup option

2011-04-18T10:05:43+00:00

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk@1094445 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

QPID-3182

2011-04-06T18:08:44+00:00

Added a test case to cover the above issue.
This class can use a bit of refactoring and some consolidation of test cases.
Hoping to do that soon.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk@1089554 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

QPID-3166: updates based on review feedback from Keith Wall

2011-03-28T09:58:51+00:00

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk@1086169 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

QPID-3166: add system test using multiple batch transacted producers with multiple consumers using unique selectors. Exposes issue detailed in QPID-3165.

2011-03-27T21:29:58+00:00

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk@1086039 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

QPID-2930

2011-03-22T23:52:23+00:00

Removed the explicit use of addressing in the test case to enable it to be run under any profile.
This seems better than excluding it from the default and 0.8 profiles as the test doesn't really have anything to do with addressing.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk@1084414 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

QPID-2930

2011-03-22T01:45:04+00:00

I had checked in an incomplete test case with rev 1082719
I had made certain changes to the test case for testing another potential fix, but forgot to revert it back to the original before committing.
Re applied the changes to adequately test the issue.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk@1084048 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

Added a test case for the issue highlighted by QPID-2930

2011-03-17T22:05:26+00:00

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk@1082719 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

QPID-2959

2011-03-17T21:56:04+00:00

Added a temp hack to get the testReplyToWithNamelessExchange passing with the java.0.10 test profile.
In doing so I realized that "qpid.declare_exchanges" has no affect on the producer side.
Therefore I added a check in BasicMessageProducer_0_10.java to check this flag before issuing an exchange_declare.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk@1082715 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

Added testReplyToWithNamelessExchange as a test case for QPID-2959

2011-03-17T21:29:50+00:00

Added testReplyToWithCustomExchange as a test case for QPID-3011
Removed testAddressBasedReplyTo as the above  test cases cover it adequately.

Currently the testReplyToWithNamelessExchange fails with the java.0.10 test profile.
This is due to the default being BURL and the replyTo address is evaluated as a BURL and as part of the logic an exchange declare is being set.
The C++ broker does seem to ignore the exchange declare of a known type (the nameless exchange in this case), while the java broker throws an exception.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk@1082709 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68

QPID-3142: enable tests to run against a copy of an existing work directory

2011-03-15T17:04:57+00:00

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk@1081858 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68