summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMike Bayer <mike_mp@zzzcomputing.com>2014-10-04 18:57:01 -0400
committerMike Bayer <mike_mp@zzzcomputing.com>2014-10-04 19:06:35 -0400
commitb510b990947cb8e461df8877ca0f011542b7a319 (patch)
tree7dc2280b3cd5378e1f89c79f5dee2b4ce67363e2
parentf7dee1380c40f3e73868a136aae5d18e976aa757 (diff)
downloadsqlalchemy-b510b990947cb8e461df8877ca0f011542b7a319.tar.gz
- use provide_metadata for new unique constraint / index tests
- add a test for PG reflection of unique index without any unique constraint - for PG, don't include 'duplicates_constraint' in the entry if the index does not actually mirror a constraint - use a distinct method for unique constraint reflection within table - catch unique constraint not implemented condition; this may be within some dialects and also is expected to be supported by Alembic tests - migration + changelogs for #3184 - add individual doc notes as well to MySQL, Postgreql fixes #3184
-rw-r--r--doc/build/changelog/changelog_10.rst32
-rw-r--r--doc/build/changelog/migration_10.rst57
-rw-r--r--lib/sqlalchemy/dialects/mysql/base.py23
-rw-r--r--lib/sqlalchemy/dialects/postgresql/base.py52
-rw-r--r--lib/sqlalchemy/engine/reflection.py15
-rw-r--r--test/dialect/mysql/test_reflection.py39
-rw-r--r--test/dialect/postgresql/test_reflection.py74
7 files changed, 237 insertions, 55 deletions
diff --git a/doc/build/changelog/changelog_10.rst b/doc/build/changelog/changelog_10.rst
index a746abeac..69b5b29c1 100644
--- a/doc/build/changelog/changelog_10.rst
+++ b/doc/build/changelog/changelog_10.rst
@@ -22,6 +22,38 @@
on compatibility concerns, see :doc:`/changelog/migration_10`.
.. change::
+ :tags: feature, sql
+ :tickets: 3184
+ :pullreq: bitbucket:30
+
+ The :class:`.UniqueConstraint` construct is now included when
+ reflecting a :class:`.Table` object, for databases where this
+ is applicable. In order to achieve this
+ with sufficient accuracy, MySQL and Postgresql now contain features
+ that correct for the duplication of indexes and unique constraints
+ when reflecting tables, indexes, and constraints.
+ In the case of MySQL, there is not actually a "unique constraint"
+ concept independent of a "unique index", so for this backend
+ :class:`.UniqueConstraint` continues to remain non-present for a
+ reflected :class:`.Table`. For Postgresql, the query used to
+ detect indexes against ``pg_index`` has been improved to check for
+ the same construct in ``pg_constraint``, and the implicitly
+ constructed unique index is not included with a
+ reflected :class:`.Table`.
+
+ In both cases, the :meth:`.Inspector.get_indexes` and the
+ :meth:`.Inspector.get_unique_constraints` methods return both
+ constructs individually, but include a new token
+ ``duplicates_constraint`` in the case of Postgresql or
+ ``duplicates_index`` in the case
+ of MySQL to indicate when this condition is detected.
+ Pull request courtesy Johannes Erdfelt.
+
+ .. seealso::
+
+ :ref:`feature_3184`
+
+ .. change::
:tags: feature, postgresql
:pullreq: github:134
diff --git a/doc/build/changelog/migration_10.rst b/doc/build/changelog/migration_10.rst
index b0ac868ec..439ec4c67 100644
--- a/doc/build/changelog/migration_10.rst
+++ b/doc/build/changelog/migration_10.rst
@@ -50,6 +50,62 @@ wishes to support the new feature should now call upon the ``._limit_clause``
and ``._offset_clause`` attributes to receive the full SQL expression, rather
than the integer value.
+.. _feature_3184:
+
+UniqueConstraint is now part of the Table reflection process
+------------------------------------------------------------
+
+A :class:`.Table` object populated using ``autoload=True`` will now
+include :class:`.UniqueConstraint` constructs as well as
+:class:`.Index` constructs. This logic has a few caveats for
+Postgresql and Mysql:
+
+Postgresql
+^^^^^^^^^^
+
+Postgresql has the behavior such that when a UNIQUE constraint is
+created, it implicitly creates a UNIQUE INDEX corresponding to that
+constraint as well. The :meth:`.Inspector.get_indexes` and the
+:meth:`.Inspector.get_unique_constraints` methods will continue to
+**both** return these entries distinctly, where
+:meth:`.Inspector.get_indexes` now features a token
+``duplicates_constraint`` within the index entry indicating the
+corresponding constraint when detected. However, when performing
+full table reflection using ``Table(..., autoload=True)``, the
+:class:`.Index` construct is detected as being linked to the
+:class:`.UniqueConstraint`, and is **not** present within the
+:attr:`.Table.indexes` collection; only the :class:`.UniqueConstraint`
+will be present in the :attr:`.Table.constraints` collection. This
+deduplication logic works by joining to the ``pg_constraint`` table
+when querying ``pg_index`` to see if the two constructs are linked.
+
+MySQL
+^^^^^
+
+MySQL does not have separate concepts for a UNIQUE INDEX and a UNIQUE
+constraint. While it supports both syntaxes when creating tables and indexes,
+it does not store them any differently. The
+:meth:`.Inspector.get_indexes`
+and the :meth:`.Inspector.get_unique_constraints` methods will continue to
+**both** return an entry for a UNIQUE index in MySQL,
+where :meth:`.Inspector.get_unique_constraints` features a new token
+``duplicates_index`` within the constraint entry indicating that this is a
+dupe entry corresponding to that index. However, when performing
+full table reflection using ``Table(..., autoload=True)``,
+the :class:`.UniqueConstraint` construct is
+**not** part of the fully reflected :class:`.Table` construct under any
+circumstances; this construct is always represented by a :class:`.Index`
+with the ``unique=True`` setting present in the :attr:`.Table.indexes`
+collection.
+
+.. seealso::
+
+ :ref:`postgresql_index_reflection`
+
+ :ref:`mysql_unique_constraints`
+
+:ticket:`3184`
+
Behavioral Improvements
=======================
@@ -1043,6 +1099,7 @@ by Postgresql as of 9.4. SQLAlchemy allows this using
:class:`.FunctionFilter`
+
MySQL internal "no such table" exceptions not passed to event handlers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/lib/sqlalchemy/dialects/mysql/base.py b/lib/sqlalchemy/dialects/mysql/base.py
index 2f85a3626..793e6566d 100644
--- a/lib/sqlalchemy/dialects/mysql/base.py
+++ b/lib/sqlalchemy/dialects/mysql/base.py
@@ -341,6 +341,29 @@ reflection will not include foreign keys. For these tables, you may supply a
:ref:`mysql_storage_engines`
+.. _mysql_unique_constraints:
+
+MySQL Unique Constraints and Reflection
+---------------------------------------
+
+SQLAlchemy supports both the :class:`.Index` construct with the
+flag ``unique=True``, indicating a UNIQUE index, as well as the
+:class:`.UniqueConstraint` construct, representing a UNIQUE constraint.
+Both objects/syntaxes are supported by MySQL when emitting DDL to create
+these constraints. However, MySQL does not have a unique constraint
+construct that is separate from a unique index; that is, the "UNIQUE"
+constraint on MySQL is equivalent to creating a "UNIQUE INDEX".
+
+When reflecting these constructs, the :meth:`.Inspector.get_indexes`
+and the :meth:`.Inspector.get_unique_constraints` methods will **both**
+return an entry for a UNIQUE index in MySQL. However, when performing
+full table reflection using ``Table(..., autoload=True)``,
+the :class:`.UniqueConstraint` construct is
+**not** part of the fully reflected :class:`.Table` construct under any
+circumstances; this construct is always represented by a :class:`.Index`
+with the ``unique=True`` setting present in the :attr:`.Table.indexes`
+collection.
+
.. _mysql_timestamp_null:
diff --git a/lib/sqlalchemy/dialects/postgresql/base.py b/lib/sqlalchemy/dialects/postgresql/base.py
index 556493b3c..baa640eaa 100644
--- a/lib/sqlalchemy/dialects/postgresql/base.py
+++ b/lib/sqlalchemy/dialects/postgresql/base.py
@@ -402,6 +402,28 @@ underlying CREATE INDEX command, so it *must* be a valid index type for your
version of PostgreSQL.
+.. _postgresql_index_reflection:
+
+Postgresql Index Reflection
+---------------------------
+
+The Postgresql database creates a UNIQUE INDEX implicitly whenever the
+UNIQUE CONSTRAINT construct is used. When inspecting a table using
+:class:`.Inspector`, the :meth:`.Inspector.get_indexes`
+and the :meth:`.Inspector.get_unique_constraints` will report on these
+two constructs distinctly; in the case of the index, the key
+``duplicates_constraint`` will be present in the index entry if it is
+detected as mirroring a constraint. When performing reflection using
+``Table(..., autoload=True)``, the UNIQUE INDEX is **not** returned
+in :attr:`.Table.indexes` when it is detected as mirroring a
+:class:`.UniqueConstraint` in the :attr:`.Table.constraints` collection.
+
+.. versionchanged:: 1.0.0 - :class:`.Table` reflection now includes
+ :class:`.UniqueConstraint` objects present in the :attr:`.Table.constraints`
+ collection; the Postgresql backend will no longer include a "mirrored"
+ :class:`.Index` construct in :attr:`.Table.indexes` if it is detected
+ as corresponding to a unique constraint.
+
Special Reflection Options
--------------------------
@@ -2523,21 +2545,27 @@ class PGDialect(default.DefaultDialect):
% idx_name)
sv_idx_name = idx_name
+ has_idx = idx_name in indexes
index = indexes[idx_name]
if col is not None:
index['cols'][col_num] = col
- index['key'] = [int(k.strip()) for k in idx_key.split()]
- index['unique'] = unique
- index['duplicates_constraint'] = (None if conrelid is None
- else idx_name)
-
- return [
- {'name': name,
- 'unique': idx['unique'],
- 'column_names': [idx['cols'][i] for i in idx['key']],
- 'duplicates_constraint': idx['duplicates_constraint']}
- for name, idx in indexes.items()
- ]
+ if not has_idx:
+ index['key'] = [int(k.strip()) for k in idx_key.split()]
+ index['unique'] = unique
+ if conrelid is not None:
+ index['duplicates_constraint'] = idx_name
+
+ result = []
+ for name, idx in indexes.items():
+ entry = {
+ 'name': name,
+ 'unique': idx['unique'],
+ 'column_names': [idx['cols'][i] for i in idx['key']]
+ }
+ if 'duplicates_constraint' in idx:
+ entry['duplicates_constraint'] = idx['duplicates_constraint']
+ result.append(entry)
+ return result
@reflection.cache
def get_unique_constraints(self, connection, table_name,
diff --git a/lib/sqlalchemy/engine/reflection.py b/lib/sqlalchemy/engine/reflection.py
index 15c2dd195..2a1def86a 100644
--- a/lib/sqlalchemy/engine/reflection.py
+++ b/lib/sqlalchemy/engine/reflection.py
@@ -508,6 +508,10 @@ class Inspector(object):
table_name, schema, table, cols_by_orig_name,
include_columns, exclude_columns, reflection_options)
+ self._reflect_unique_constraints(
+ table_name, schema, table, cols_by_orig_name,
+ include_columns, exclude_columns, reflection_options)
+
def _reflect_column(
self, table, col_d, include_columns,
exclude_columns, cols_by_orig_name):
@@ -665,8 +669,17 @@ class Inspector(object):
sa_schema.Index(name, *idx_cols, **dict(unique=unique))
+ def _reflect_unique_constraints(
+ self, table_name, schema, table, cols_by_orig_name,
+ include_columns, exclude_columns, reflection_options):
+
# Unique Constraints
- constraints = self.get_unique_constraints(table_name, schema)
+ try:
+ constraints = self.get_unique_constraints(table_name, schema)
+ except NotImplementedError:
+ # optional dialect feature
+ return
+
for const_d in constraints:
conname = const_d['name']
columns = const_d['column_names']
diff --git a/test/dialect/mysql/test_reflection.py b/test/dialect/mysql/test_reflection.py
index b8f72b942..99733e397 100644
--- a/test/dialect/mysql/test_reflection.py
+++ b/test/dialect/mysql/test_reflection.py
@@ -283,36 +283,37 @@ class ReflectionTest(fixtures.TestBase, AssertsExecutionResults):
view_names = dialect.get_view_names(connection, "information_schema")
self.assert_('TABLES' in view_names)
+ @testing.provide_metadata
def test_reflection_with_unique_constraint(self):
insp = inspect(testing.db)
- uc_table = Table('mysql_uc', MetaData(testing.db),
+ meta = self.metadata
+ uc_table = Table('mysql_uc', meta,
Column('a', String(10)),
UniqueConstraint('a', name='uc_a'))
- try:
- uc_table.create()
+ uc_table.create()
- # MySQL converts unique constraints into unique indexes and
- # the 0.9 API returns it as both an index and a constraint
- indexes = set(i['name'] for i in insp.get_indexes('mysql_uc'))
- constraints = set(i['name']
- for i in insp.get_unique_constraints('mysql_uc'))
+ # MySQL converts unique constraints into unique indexes.
+ # separately we get both
+ indexes = dict((i['name'], i) for i in insp.get_indexes('mysql_uc'))
+ constraints = set(i['name']
+ for i in insp.get_unique_constraints('mysql_uc'))
- self.assert_('uc_a' in indexes)
- self.assert_('uc_a' in constraints)
+ self.assert_('uc_a' in indexes)
+ self.assert_(indexes['uc_a']['unique'])
+ self.assert_('uc_a' in constraints)
- # However, upon creating a Table object via reflection, it should
- # only appear as a unique index and not a constraint
- reflected = Table('mysql_uc', MetaData(testing.db), autoload=True)
+ # reflection here favors the unique index, as that's the
+ # more "official" MySQL construct
+ reflected = Table('mysql_uc', MetaData(testing.db), autoload=True)
- indexes = set(i.name for i in reflected.indexes)
- constraints = set(uc.name for uc in reflected.constraints)
+ indexes = dict((i.name, i) for i in reflected.indexes)
+ constraints = set(uc.name for uc in reflected.constraints)
- self.assert_('uc_a' in indexes)
- self.assert_('uc_a' not in constraints)
- finally:
- uc_table.drop()
+ self.assert_('uc_a' in indexes)
+ self.assert_(indexes['uc_a'].unique)
+ self.assert_('uc_a' not in constraints)
class RawReflectionTest(fixtures.TestBase):
diff --git a/test/dialect/postgresql/test_reflection.py b/test/dialect/postgresql/test_reflection.py
index fc013c72a..8de71216e 100644
--- a/test/dialect/postgresql/test_reflection.py
+++ b/test/dialect/postgresql/test_reflection.py
@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@ from sqlalchemy.testing import fixtures
from sqlalchemy import testing
from sqlalchemy import inspect
from sqlalchemy import Table, Column, MetaData, Integer, String, \
- PrimaryKeyConstraint, ForeignKey, join, Sequence, UniqueConstraint
+ PrimaryKeyConstraint, ForeignKey, join, Sequence, UniqueConstraint, \
+ Index
from sqlalchemy import exc
import sqlalchemy as sa
from sqlalchemy.dialects.postgresql import base as postgresql
@@ -656,8 +657,7 @@ class ReflectionTest(fixtures.TestBase):
conn.execute("ALTER TABLE t RENAME COLUMN x to y")
ind = testing.db.dialect.get_indexes(conn, "t", None)
- eq_(ind, [{'unique': False, 'duplicates_constraint': None,
- 'column_names': ['y'], 'name': 'idx1'}])
+ eq_(ind, [{'unique': False, 'column_names': ['y'], 'name': 'idx1'}])
conn.close()
@testing.provide_metadata
@@ -804,37 +804,65 @@ class ReflectionTest(fixtures.TestBase):
'labels': ['sad', 'ok', 'happy']
}])
+ @testing.provide_metadata
def test_reflection_with_unique_constraint(self):
insp = inspect(testing.db)
- uc_table = Table('pgsql_uc', MetaData(testing.db),
+ meta = self.metadata
+ uc_table = Table('pgsql_uc', meta,
Column('a', String(10)),
UniqueConstraint('a', name='uc_a'))
- try:
- uc_table.create()
+ uc_table.create()
- # PostgreSQL will create an implicit index for a unique
- # constraint. As a result, the 0.9 API returns it as both
- # an index and a constraint
- indexes = set(i['name'] for i in insp.get_indexes('pgsql_uc'))
- constraints = set(i['name']
- for i in insp.get_unique_constraints('pgsql_uc'))
+ # PostgreSQL will create an implicit index for a unique
+ # constraint. Separately we get both
+ indexes = set(i['name'] for i in insp.get_indexes('pgsql_uc'))
+ constraints = set(i['name']
+ for i in insp.get_unique_constraints('pgsql_uc'))
- self.assert_('uc_a' in indexes)
- self.assert_('uc_a' in constraints)
+ self.assert_('uc_a' in indexes)
+ self.assert_('uc_a' in constraints)
- # However, upon creating a Table object via reflection, it should
- # only appear as a unique constraint and not an index
- reflected = Table('pgsql_uc', MetaData(testing.db), autoload=True)
+ # reflection corrects for the dupe
+ reflected = Table('pgsql_uc', MetaData(testing.db), autoload=True)
- indexes = set(i.name for i in reflected.indexes)
- constraints = set(uc.name for uc in reflected.constraints)
+ indexes = set(i.name for i in reflected.indexes)
+ constraints = set(uc.name for uc in reflected.constraints)
- self.assert_('uc_a' not in indexes)
- self.assert_('uc_a' in constraints)
- finally:
- uc_table.drop()
+ self.assert_('uc_a' not in indexes)
+ self.assert_('uc_a' in constraints)
+
+ @testing.provide_metadata
+ def test_reflect_unique_index(self):
+ insp = inspect(testing.db)
+
+ meta = self.metadata
+
+ # a unique index OTOH we are able to detect is an index
+ # and not a unique constraint
+ uc_table = Table('pgsql_uc', meta,
+ Column('a', String(10)),
+ Index('ix_a', 'a', unique=True))
+
+ uc_table.create()
+
+ indexes = dict((i['name'], i) for i in insp.get_indexes('pgsql_uc'))
+ constraints = set(i['name']
+ for i in insp.get_unique_constraints('pgsql_uc'))
+
+ self.assert_('ix_a' in indexes)
+ assert indexes['ix_a']['unique']
+ self.assert_('ix_a' not in constraints)
+
+ reflected = Table('pgsql_uc', MetaData(testing.db), autoload=True)
+
+ indexes = dict((i.name, i) for i in reflected.indexes)
+ constraints = set(uc.name for uc in reflected.constraints)
+
+ self.assert_('ix_a' in indexes)
+ assert indexes['ix_a'].unique
+ self.assert_('ix_a' not in constraints)
class CustomTypeReflectionTest(fixtures.TestBase):