diff options
| author | Matthias Radestock <matthias@rabbitmq.com> | 2013-02-21 12:43:50 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Matthias Radestock <matthias@rabbitmq.com> | 2013-02-21 12:43:50 +0000 |
| commit | 2ba2833db6964c376ae631e4e2c2077035a32d04 (patch) | |
| tree | 96e105735cf0b7dcdb0b54f8553273250bc27be1 /src | |
| parent | f4675d2018e859f1d6c5b4b264c30e9e92644b71 (diff) | |
| download | rabbitmq-server-git-2ba2833db6964c376ae631e4e2c2077035a32d04.tar.gz | |
simplify queue's basic_consume handler
backported from bug23749 branch
- the call to update_ch_record in the is_ch_blocked(C1) == false
branch was superfluos since the preceding update_consumer_count
calls update_ch_record
- all the checking whether the channel is blocked, and associated
branching was just an optimisation. And not a particularly important
one, since a) the "a new consumer comes along while its
channel is blocked" case is hardly on the critical path, and b)
exactly the same check is performed as part of run_message_queue (in
deliver_msg_to_consumer/3). So get rid of it.
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/rabbit_amqqueue_process.erl | 16 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/src/rabbit_amqqueue_process.erl b/src/rabbit_amqqueue_process.erl index ef48bb5d5e..fba58d38d7 100644 --- a/src/rabbit_amqqueue_process.erl +++ b/src/rabbit_amqqueue_process.erl @@ -1097,7 +1097,7 @@ handle_call({basic_consume, NoAck, ChPid, Limiter, reply({error, exclusive_consume_unavailable}, State); ok -> C = ch_record(ChPid), - C1 = update_consumer_count(C#cr{limiter = Limiter}, +1), + update_consumer_count(C#cr{limiter = Limiter}, +1), Consumer = #consumer{tag = ConsumerTag, ack_required = not NoAck}, ExclusiveConsumer = if ExclusiveConsume -> {ChPid, ConsumerTag}; @@ -1106,18 +1106,10 @@ handle_call({basic_consume, NoAck, ChPid, Limiter, State1 = State#q{has_had_consumers = true, exclusive_consumer = ExclusiveConsumer}, ok = maybe_send_reply(ChPid, OkMsg), - E = {ChPid, Consumer}, - State2 = - case is_ch_blocked(C1) of - true -> block_consumer(C1, E), - State1; - false -> update_ch_record(C1), - AC1 = queue:in(E, State1#q.active_consumers), - run_message_queue(State1#q{active_consumers = AC1}) - end, emit_consumer_created(ChPid, ConsumerTag, ExclusiveConsume, - not NoAck, qname(State2)), - reply(ok, State2) + not NoAck, qname(State1)), + AC1 = queue:in({ChPid, Consumer}, State1#q.active_consumers), + reply(ok, run_message_queue(State1#q{active_consumers = AC1})) end; handle_call({basic_cancel, ChPid, ConsumerTag, OkMsg}, From, |