diff options
| author | Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@rubychan.de> | 2012-07-18 11:46:41 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@rubychan.de> | 2012-07-18 11:46:41 +0200 |
| commit | a1582d7856bc385b7bad492d8fc3f02e2b9f4d94 (patch) | |
| tree | 3abdb3a7d6aa00edca62fc5b36cf9a9a8242b245 /etc/highlighter-rating.textile | |
| parent | a4b8b094da5525354cb8a927761385825236c5a1 (diff) | |
| download | coderay-a1582d7856bc385b7bad492d8fc3f02e2b9f4d94.tar.gz | |
remove etc folder
Diffstat (limited to 'etc/highlighter-rating.textile')
| -rw-r--r-- | etc/highlighter-rating.textile | 39 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 39 deletions
diff --git a/etc/highlighter-rating.textile b/etc/highlighter-rating.textile deleted file mode 100644 index ece3e26..0000000 --- a/etc/highlighter-rating.textile +++ /dev/null @@ -1,39 +0,0 @@ -h1=. Star Ratings for Syntax Highlighter Language Support (Draft) - -p={font-style: italic}. murphy 2008-11-06, updated 2008-12-25 - -h2. Abstract - -A proposal for a simple, 6-level star rating to estimate a syntax highlighters' support of a given language. - -h2. Levels - -I propose five levels, which can be represented with 0 to 5 out of 5 stars: - -|_=. Name |_=. Level |_. Stars | -|>. No support |=. 0 | ☆☆☆☆☆ | -|>. Poor support |=. 1 | ★☆☆☆☆ | -|>. Basic support |=. 2 | ★★☆☆☆ | -|>. Good support |=. 3 | ★★★☆☆ | -|>. Very good support |=. 4 | ★★★★☆ | -|>. Perfect support |=. 5 | ★★★★★ | - -h3. Definition - -Each rating has an associated support percentage and a short description. - -|_<. Name |_. Stars |_>. % |_<. Description | -| No support | ☆☆☆☆☆ |>. 0 | Missing, broken, or useless. | -| Poor support | ★☆☆☆☆ |>. 70 | Highlights average code, fails on complex code, hangs up, buggy. | -| Basic support | ★★☆☆☆ |>. 90 | Good highlighting for typical code, problems with complex code. | -| Good support | ★★★☆☆ |>. 98 | Solid highlighting for most code, some problems with very complex code. | -| Very good support | ★★★★☆ |>. 99 | Perfect highlighting even for complex code, only small problems with edge cases. | -| Perfect support | ★★★★★ |>. 100 | Complete highlighting, can be used as reference. | - -h2. Rating Process - -The star ratings are defined above. It is completely up to the author of a scanner to rate their work. - -However, they should be careful not to overrate a scanner/lexer. Ratings of 2 and up should only be granted for tested code. A rating of 3 should not be given without a review of another person who knows the language very well. A rating of 5 is very rare for complex languages; such scanners should be bug free, feature complete, and absolutely reliable. A rating of 4 is typically the goal for a developer. - - |