[clang-scan-deps] Support for clang --analyze in clang-scan-deps

The goal is to have 100% fidelity in clang-scan-deps behavior when
--analyze is present in compilation command.

At the same time I don't want to break clang-tidy which expects
__static_analyzer__ macro defined as built-in.

I introduce new cc1 options (-setup-static-analyzer) that controls
the macro definition and is conditionally set in driver.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68093

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@374815 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

3 files changed, 11 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp b/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
index e35408876b..52fe20c3a9 100644
--- a/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
+++ b/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
@@ -3803,6 +3803,10 @@ void Clang::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const JobAction &JA,
   if (isa<AnalyzeJobAction>(JA))
     RenderAnalyzerOptions(Args, CmdArgs, Triple, Input);
 
+  if (isa<AnalyzeJobAction>(JA) ||
+      (isa<PreprocessJobAction>(JA) && Args.hasArg(options::OPT__analyze)))
+    CmdArgs.push_back("-setup-static-analyzer");
+
   // Enable compatilibily mode to avoid analyzer-config related errors.
   // Since we can't access frontend flags through hasArg, let's manually iterate
   // through them.
diff --git a/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp b/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp
index 3c0fc391ea..9d5987f07f 100644
--- a/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp
+++ b/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp
@@ -3349,6 +3349,8 @@ static void ParsePreprocessorArgs(PreprocessorOptions &Opts, ArgList &Args,
   // "editor placeholder in source file" error in PP only mode.
   if (isStrictlyPreprocessorAction(Action))
     Opts.LexEditorPlaceholders = false;
+
+  Opts.SetUpStaticAnalyzer = Args.hasArg(OPT_setup_static_analyzer);
 }
 
 static void ParsePreprocessorOutputArgs(PreprocessorOutputOptions &Opts,
diff --git a/lib/Frontend/InitPreprocessor.cpp b/lib/Frontend/InitPreprocessor.cpp
index 6810379c6f..3715dcfda4 100644
--- a/lib/Frontend/InitPreprocessor.cpp
+++ b/lib/Frontend/InitPreprocessor.cpp
@@ -560,6 +560,7 @@ static void InitializeCPlusPlusFeatureTestMacros(const LangOptions &LangOpts,
 static void InitializePredefinedMacros(const TargetInfo &TI,
                                        const LangOptions &LangOpts,
                                        const FrontendOptions &FEOpts,
+                                       const PreprocessorOptions &PPOpts,
                                        MacroBuilder &Builder) {
   // Compiler version introspection macros.
   Builder.defineMacro("__llvm__");  // LLVM Backend
@@ -997,8 +998,7 @@ static void InitializePredefinedMacros(const TargetInfo &TI,
   else if (LangOpts.getStackProtector() == LangOptions::SSPReq)
     Builder.defineMacro("__SSP_ALL__", "3");
 
-  // Define a macro that exists only when using the static analyzer.
-  if (FEOpts.ProgramAction == frontend::RunAnalysis)
+  if (PPOpts.SetUpStaticAnalyzer)
     Builder.defineMacro("__clang_analyzer__");
 
   if (LangOpts.FastRelaxedMath)
@@ -1125,9 +1125,10 @@ void clang::InitializePreprocessor(
     // macros. This is not the right way to handle this.
     if ((LangOpts.CUDA || LangOpts.OpenMPIsDevice) && PP.getAuxTargetInfo())
       InitializePredefinedMacros(*PP.getAuxTargetInfo(), LangOpts, FEOpts,
-                                 Builder);
+                                 PP.getPreprocessorOpts(), Builder);
 
-    InitializePredefinedMacros(PP.getTargetInfo(), LangOpts, FEOpts, Builder);
+    InitializePredefinedMacros(PP.getTargetInfo(), LangOpts, FEOpts,
+                               PP.getPreprocessorOpts(), Builder);
 
     // Install definitions to make Objective-C++ ARC work well with various
     // C++ Standard Library implementations.