diff options
| author | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2010-01-01 21:53:49 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2010-01-01 21:53:49 +0000 |
| commit | 29c4ad98293e3c5cb3fcdd413a3f4904efff8762 (patch) | |
| tree | 4e4eeea2655e87eca4d3d0dd97f3e2b7d5f1e032 /src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtutils.c | |
| parent | 15faca259651c065bb20e746777f5fb9eb9d50a1 (diff) | |
| download | postgresql-29c4ad98293e3c5cb3fcdd413a3f4904efff8762.tar.gz | |
Support "x IS NOT NULL" clauses as indexscan conditions. This turns out
to be just a minor extension of the previous patch that made "x IS NULL"
indexable, because we can treat the IS NOT NULL condition as if it were
"x < NULL" or "x > NULL" (depending on the index's NULLS FIRST/LAST option),
just like IS NULL is treated like "x = NULL". Aside from any possible
usefulness in its own right, this is an important improvement for
index-optimized MAX/MIN aggregates: it is now reliably possible to get
a column's min or max value cheaply, even when there are a lot of nulls
cluttering the interesting end of the index.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtutils.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtutils.c | 144 |
1 files changed, 109 insertions, 35 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtutils.c b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtutils.c index b715f60d24..33d3c9e8e7 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtutils.c +++ b/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtutils.c @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ * * * IDENTIFICATION - * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtutils.c,v 1.94 2009/10/08 22:34:57 tgl Exp $ + * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/access/nbtree/nbtutils.c,v 1.95 2010/01/01 21:53:49 tgl Exp $ * *------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ @@ -276,6 +276,11 @@ _bt_preprocess_keys(IndexScanDesc scan) * in any particular strategy in this case, so set it to * BTEqualStrategyNumber --- we can treat IS NULL as an equality * operator for purposes of search strategy. + * + * Likewise, "x IS NOT NULL" is supported. We treat that as either + * "less than NULL" in a NULLS LAST index, or "greater than NULL" + * in a NULLS FIRST index. However, we have to flip those around in + * a DESC index, to allow for the re-flipping that occurs elsewhere. */ if (cur->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL) { @@ -284,6 +289,21 @@ _bt_preprocess_keys(IndexScanDesc scan) cur->sk_strategy = BTEqualStrategyNumber; cur->sk_subtype = InvalidOid; } + else if (cur->sk_flags & SK_SEARCHNOTNULL) + { + switch (indoption[cur->sk_attno - 1] & + (INDOPTION_DESC | INDOPTION_NULLS_FIRST)) + { + case 0: /* ASC / NULLS LAST */ + case INDOPTION_DESC | INDOPTION_NULLS_FIRST: + cur->sk_strategy = BTLessStrategyNumber; + break; + default: + cur->sk_strategy = BTGreaterStrategyNumber; + break; + } + cur->sk_subtype = InvalidOid; + } else so->qual_ok = false; } @@ -320,7 +340,7 @@ _bt_preprocess_keys(IndexScanDesc scan) { if (i < numberOfKeys) { - /* See comments above about NULLs and IS NULL handling. */ + /* See comments above about NULLs and IS NULL/NOT NULL handling */ /* Note: we assume SK_ISNULL is never set in a row header key */ if (cur->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL) { @@ -329,6 +349,21 @@ _bt_preprocess_keys(IndexScanDesc scan) cur->sk_strategy = BTEqualStrategyNumber; cur->sk_subtype = InvalidOid; } + else if (cur->sk_flags & SK_SEARCHNOTNULL) + { + switch (indoption[cur->sk_attno - 1] & + (INDOPTION_DESC | INDOPTION_NULLS_FIRST)) + { + case 0: /* ASC / NULLS LAST */ + case INDOPTION_DESC | INDOPTION_NULLS_FIRST: + cur->sk_strategy = BTLessStrategyNumber; + break; + default: + cur->sk_strategy = BTGreaterStrategyNumber; + break; + } + cur->sk_subtype = InvalidOid; + } else { so->qual_ok = false; @@ -365,13 +400,6 @@ _bt_preprocess_keys(IndexScanDesc scan) if (!chk || j == (BTEqualStrategyNumber - 1)) continue; - /* IS NULL together with any other predicate must fail */ - if (eq->sk_flags & SK_SEARCHNULL) - { - so->qual_ok = false; - return; - } - if (_bt_compare_scankey_args(scan, chk, eq, chk, &test_result)) { @@ -484,23 +512,6 @@ _bt_preprocess_keys(IndexScanDesc scan) else { /* yup, keep only the more restrictive key */ - - /* if either arg is NULL, don't try to compare */ - if ((cur->sk_flags | xform[j]->sk_flags) & SK_ISNULL) - { - /* at least one of them must be an IS NULL clause */ - Assert(j == (BTEqualStrategyNumber - 1)); - Assert((cur->sk_flags | xform[j]->sk_flags) & SK_SEARCHNULL); - /* if one is and one isn't, the search must fail */ - if ((cur->sk_flags ^ xform[j]->sk_flags) & SK_SEARCHNULL) - { - so->qual_ok = false; - return; - } - /* we have duplicate IS NULL clauses, ignore the newer one */ - continue; - } - if (_bt_compare_scankey_args(scan, cur, cur, xform[j], &test_result)) { @@ -534,8 +545,7 @@ _bt_preprocess_keys(IndexScanDesc scan) } /* - * Compare two scankey values using a specified operator. Both values - * must be already known non-NULL. + * Compare two scankey values using a specified operator. * * The test we want to perform is logically "leftarg op rightarg", where * leftarg and rightarg are the sk_argument values in those ScanKeys, and @@ -555,8 +565,7 @@ _bt_preprocess_keys(IndexScanDesc scan) * * Note: this routine needs to be insensitive to any DESC option applied * to the index column. For example, "x < 4" is a tighter constraint than - * "x < 5" regardless of which way the index is sorted. We don't worry about - * NULLS FIRST/LAST either, since the given values are never nulls. + * "x < 5" regardless of which way the index is sorted. */ static bool _bt_compare_scankey_args(IndexScanDesc scan, ScanKey op, @@ -572,6 +581,64 @@ _bt_compare_scankey_args(IndexScanDesc scan, ScanKey op, StrategyNumber strat; /* + * First, deal with cases where one or both args are NULL. This should + * only happen when the scankeys represent IS NULL/NOT NULL conditions. + */ + if ((leftarg->sk_flags | rightarg->sk_flags) & SK_ISNULL) + { + bool leftnull, + rightnull; + + if (leftarg->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL) + { + Assert(leftarg->sk_flags & (SK_SEARCHNULL | SK_SEARCHNOTNULL)); + leftnull = true; + } + else + leftnull = false; + if (rightarg->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL) + { + Assert(rightarg->sk_flags & (SK_SEARCHNULL | SK_SEARCHNOTNULL)); + rightnull = true; + } + else + rightnull = false; + + /* + * We treat NULL as either greater than or less than all other values. + * Since true > false, the tests below work correctly for NULLS LAST + * logic. If the index is NULLS FIRST, we need to flip the strategy. + */ + strat = op->sk_strategy; + if (op->sk_flags & SK_BT_NULLS_FIRST) + strat = BTCommuteStrategyNumber(strat); + + switch (strat) + { + case BTLessStrategyNumber: + *result = (leftnull < rightnull); + break; + case BTLessEqualStrategyNumber: + *result = (leftnull <= rightnull); + break; + case BTEqualStrategyNumber: + *result = (leftnull == rightnull); + break; + case BTGreaterEqualStrategyNumber: + *result = (leftnull >= rightnull); + break; + case BTGreaterStrategyNumber: + *result = (leftnull > rightnull); + break; + default: + elog(ERROR, "unrecognized StrategyNumber: %d", (int) strat); + *result = false; /* keep compiler quiet */ + break; + } + return true; + } + + /* * The opfamily we need to worry about is identified by the index column. */ Assert(leftarg->sk_attno == rightarg->sk_attno); @@ -844,11 +911,18 @@ _bt_checkkeys(IndexScanDesc scan, if (key->sk_flags & SK_ISNULL) { - /* Handle IS NULL tests */ - Assert(key->sk_flags & SK_SEARCHNULL); - - if (isNull) - continue; /* tuple satisfies this qual */ + /* Handle IS NULL/NOT NULL tests */ + if (key->sk_flags & SK_SEARCHNULL) + { + if (isNull) + continue; /* tuple satisfies this qual */ + } + else + { + Assert(key->sk_flags & SK_SEARCHNOTNULL); + if (!isNull) + continue; /* tuple satisfies this qual */ + } /* * Tuple fails this qual. If it's a required qual for the current |
