diff options
| author | wiemann <wiemann@929543f6-e4f2-0310-98a6-ba3bd3dd1d04> | 2005-08-17 13:59:12 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | wiemann <wiemann@929543f6-e4f2-0310-98a6-ba3bd3dd1d04> | 2005-08-17 13:59:12 +0000 |
| commit | a4bc0d09f3d1f633a5780976d1f913e083c9564a (patch) | |
| tree | 1777475e88463b08438f0719be97cc087554eadd /docs/dev/enthought-rfp.txt | |
| parent | 60c69f8cf97125135948a3d35b7698ee80921137 (diff) | |
| parent | 2818db9a234cc37008c5f2bb0e821f9b1fa92de2 (diff) | |
| download | docutils-0.3.9.tar.gz | |
re-added docutils-0.3.9 tag one level deeper (without web/ and sandboxes/)docutils-0.3.9
git-svn-id: http://svn.code.sf.net/p/docutils/code/tags/docutils-0.3.9@3815 929543f6-e4f2-0310-98a6-ba3bd3dd1d04
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/dev/enthought-rfp.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/dev/enthought-rfp.txt | 146 |
1 files changed, 146 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/dev/enthought-rfp.txt b/docs/dev/enthought-rfp.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000..86c932c70 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/dev/enthought-rfp.txt @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@ +================================== + Enthought API Documentation Tool +================================== +----------------------- + Request for Proposals +----------------------- + +:Author: Janet Swisher, Senior Technical Writer +:Organization: `Enthought, Inc. <http://www.enthought.com>`_ +:Copyright: 2004 by Enthought, Inc. +:License: `Enthought License`_ (BSD Style) + +.. _Enthought License: http://docutils.sf.net/licenses/enthought.txt + +The following is excerpted from the full RFP, and is published here +with permission from `Enthought, Inc.`_ See the `Plan for Enthought +API Documentation Tool`__. + +__ enthought-plan.html + +.. contents:: +.. sectnum:: + + +Requirements +============ + +The documentation tool will address the following high-level goals: + + +Documentation Extraction +------------------------ + +1. Documentation will be generated directly from Python source code, + drawing from the code structure, docstrings, and possibly other + comments. + +2. The tool will extract logical constructs as appropriate, minimizing + the need for comments that are redundant with the code structure. + The output should reflect both documented and undocumented + elements. + + +Source Format +------------- + +1. The docstrings will be formatted in as terse syntax as possible. + Required tags, syntax, and white space should be minimized. + +2. The tool must support the use of Traits. Special comment syntax + for Traits may be necessary. Information about the Traits package + is available at http://old.scipy.org/site_content/traits. In the + following example, each trait definition is prefaced by a plain + comment:: + + __traits__ = { + + # The current selection within the frame. + 'selection' : Trait([], TraitInstance(list)), + + # The frame has been activated or deactivated. + 'activated' : TraitEvent(), + + 'closing' : TraitEvent(), + + # The frame is closed. + 'closed' : TraitEvent(), + } + +3. Support for ReStructuredText (ReST) format is desirable, because + much of the existing docstrings uses ReST. However, the complete + ReST specification need not be supported, if a subset can achieve + the project goals. If the tool does not support ReST, the + contractor should also provide a tool or path to convert existing + docstrings. + + +Output Format +------------- + +1. Documentation will be output as a navigable suite of HTML + files. + +2. The style of the HTML files will be customizable by a cascading + style sheet and/or a customizable template. + +3. Page elements such as headers and footer should be customizable, to + support differing requirements from one documentation project to + the next. + + +Output Structure and Navigation +------------------------------- + +1. The navigation scheme for the HTML files should not rely on frames, + and should harmonize with conversion to Microsoft HTML Help (.chm) + format. + +2. The output should be structured to make navigable the architecture + of the Python code. Packages, modules, classes, traits, and + functions should be presented in clear, logical hierarchies. + Diagrams or trees for inheritance, collaboration, sub-packaging, + etc. are desirable but not required. + +3. The output must include indexes that provide a comprehensive view + of all packages, modules, and classes. These indexes will provide + readers with a clear and exhaustive view of the code base. These + indexes should be presented in a way that is easily accessible and + allows easy navigation. + +4. Cross-references to other documented elements will be used + throughout the documentation, to enable the reader to move quickly + relevant information. For example, where type information for an + element is available, the type definition should be + cross-referenced. + +5. The HTML suite should provide consistent navigation back to the + home page, which will include the following information: + + * Bibliographic information + + - Author + - Copyright + - Release date + - Version number + + * Abstract + + * References + + - Links to related internal docs (i.e., other docs for the same + product) + + - Links to related external docs (e.g., supporting development + docs, Python support docs, docs for included packages) + + It should be possible to specify similar information at the top + level of each package, so that packages can be included as + appropriate for a given application. + + +License +======= + +Enthought intends to release the software under an open-source +("BSD-style") license. |
