summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/docs/dev/enthought-rfp.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorwiemann <wiemann@929543f6-e4f2-0310-98a6-ba3bd3dd1d04>2005-08-17 13:59:12 +0000
committerwiemann <wiemann@929543f6-e4f2-0310-98a6-ba3bd3dd1d04>2005-08-17 13:59:12 +0000
commita4bc0d09f3d1f633a5780976d1f913e083c9564a (patch)
tree1777475e88463b08438f0719be97cc087554eadd /docs/dev/enthought-rfp.txt
parent60c69f8cf97125135948a3d35b7698ee80921137 (diff)
parent2818db9a234cc37008c5f2bb0e821f9b1fa92de2 (diff)
downloaddocutils-0.3.9.tar.gz
re-added docutils-0.3.9 tag one level deeper (without web/ and sandboxes/)docutils-0.3.9
git-svn-id: http://svn.code.sf.net/p/docutils/code/tags/docutils-0.3.9@3815 929543f6-e4f2-0310-98a6-ba3bd3dd1d04
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/dev/enthought-rfp.txt')
-rw-r--r--docs/dev/enthought-rfp.txt146
1 files changed, 146 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/dev/enthought-rfp.txt b/docs/dev/enthought-rfp.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..86c932c70
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/dev/enthought-rfp.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
+==================================
+ Enthought API Documentation Tool
+==================================
+-----------------------
+ Request for Proposals
+-----------------------
+
+:Author: Janet Swisher, Senior Technical Writer
+:Organization: `Enthought, Inc. <http://www.enthought.com>`_
+:Copyright: 2004 by Enthought, Inc.
+:License: `Enthought License`_ (BSD Style)
+
+.. _Enthought License: http://docutils.sf.net/licenses/enthought.txt
+
+The following is excerpted from the full RFP, and is published here
+with permission from `Enthought, Inc.`_ See the `Plan for Enthought
+API Documentation Tool`__.
+
+__ enthought-plan.html
+
+.. contents::
+.. sectnum::
+
+
+Requirements
+============
+
+The documentation tool will address the following high-level goals:
+
+
+Documentation Extraction
+------------------------
+
+1. Documentation will be generated directly from Python source code,
+ drawing from the code structure, docstrings, and possibly other
+ comments.
+
+2. The tool will extract logical constructs as appropriate, minimizing
+ the need for comments that are redundant with the code structure.
+ The output should reflect both documented and undocumented
+ elements.
+
+
+Source Format
+-------------
+
+1. The docstrings will be formatted in as terse syntax as possible.
+ Required tags, syntax, and white space should be minimized.
+
+2. The tool must support the use of Traits. Special comment syntax
+ for Traits may be necessary. Information about the Traits package
+ is available at http://old.scipy.org/site_content/traits. In the
+ following example, each trait definition is prefaced by a plain
+ comment::
+
+ __traits__ = {
+
+ # The current selection within the frame.
+ 'selection' : Trait([], TraitInstance(list)),
+
+ # The frame has been activated or deactivated.
+ 'activated' : TraitEvent(),
+
+ 'closing' : TraitEvent(),
+
+ # The frame is closed.
+ 'closed' : TraitEvent(),
+ }
+
+3. Support for ReStructuredText (ReST) format is desirable, because
+ much of the existing docstrings uses ReST. However, the complete
+ ReST specification need not be supported, if a subset can achieve
+ the project goals. If the tool does not support ReST, the
+ contractor should also provide a tool or path to convert existing
+ docstrings.
+
+
+Output Format
+-------------
+
+1. Documentation will be output as a navigable suite of HTML
+ files.
+
+2. The style of the HTML files will be customizable by a cascading
+ style sheet and/or a customizable template.
+
+3. Page elements such as headers and footer should be customizable, to
+ support differing requirements from one documentation project to
+ the next.
+
+
+Output Structure and Navigation
+-------------------------------
+
+1. The navigation scheme for the HTML files should not rely on frames,
+ and should harmonize with conversion to Microsoft HTML Help (.chm)
+ format.
+
+2. The output should be structured to make navigable the architecture
+ of the Python code. Packages, modules, classes, traits, and
+ functions should be presented in clear, logical hierarchies.
+ Diagrams or trees for inheritance, collaboration, sub-packaging,
+ etc. are desirable but not required.
+
+3. The output must include indexes that provide a comprehensive view
+ of all packages, modules, and classes. These indexes will provide
+ readers with a clear and exhaustive view of the code base. These
+ indexes should be presented in a way that is easily accessible and
+ allows easy navigation.
+
+4. Cross-references to other documented elements will be used
+ throughout the documentation, to enable the reader to move quickly
+ relevant information. For example, where type information for an
+ element is available, the type definition should be
+ cross-referenced.
+
+5. The HTML suite should provide consistent navigation back to the
+ home page, which will include the following information:
+
+ * Bibliographic information
+
+ - Author
+ - Copyright
+ - Release date
+ - Version number
+
+ * Abstract
+
+ * References
+
+ - Links to related internal docs (i.e., other docs for the same
+ product)
+
+ - Links to related external docs (e.g., supporting development
+ docs, Python support docs, docs for included packages)
+
+ It should be possible to specify similar information at the top
+ level of each package, so that packages can be included as
+ appropriate for a given application.
+
+
+License
+=======
+
+Enthought intends to release the software under an open-source
+("BSD-style") license.