Merge branch 'stasks' into async

4 files changed, 79 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/lib/git/async/channel.py b/lib/git/async/channel.py
index 2add9478..2d5ab79c 100644
--- a/lib/git/async/channel.py
+++ b/lib/git/async/channel.py
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 """Contains a queue based channel implementation"""
 from Queue import (
-	Queue, 
 	Empty, 
 	Full
 	)
 
+from util import AsyncQueue
 from time import time
 import sys
 
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ class WChannel(Channel):
 		"""initialize this instance, able to hold max_items at once
 		Write calls will block if the channel is full, until someone reads from it"""
 		self._closed = False
-		self._queue = Queue(max_items)
+		self._queue = AsyncQueue(max_items)
 		
 	
 	#{ Interface 
diff --git a/lib/git/async/pool.py b/lib/git/async/pool.py
index 19fc9f6e..d6b5711d 100644
--- a/lib/git/async/pool.py
+++ b/lib/git/async/pool.py
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ from threading import Lock
 from util import (
 		SyncQueue,
 		AsyncQueue,
+		DummyLock
 	)
 
 from task import InputChannelTask
@@ -80,12 +81,13 @@ class RPoolChannel(RChannel):
 		# * 
 		have_enough = False
 		if count > 0:
-			have_enough = self._wc._queue.qsize() >= count
-		# END risky game
+			have_enough = self._task.scheduled_item_count() >= count or self._wc._queue.qsize() >= count
+		# END 
 		
 		########## prepare ##############################
 		if not have_enough:
 			self._pool._prepare_channel_read(self._task, count)
+		# END prepare pool scheduling
 		
 		
 		####### read data ########
@@ -260,26 +262,33 @@ class Pool(object):
 				queue = self._queue
 				if numchunks > 1:
 					for i in xrange(numchunks):
+						# schedule them as early as we know about them
+						task.add_scheduled_items(chunksize)
 						queue.put((task.process, chunksize))
 					# END for each chunk to put
 				else:
+					task.add_scheduled_items(chunksize)
 					queue.put((task.process, chunksize))
 				# END try efficient looping
 				
 				if remainder:
+					task.add_scheduled_items(remainder)
 					queue.put((task.process, remainder))
 				# END handle chunksize
 			else:
 				# no workers, so we have to do the work ourselves
 				if numchunks > 1:
 					for i in xrange(numchunks):
+						task.add_scheduled_items(chunksize)
 						task.process(chunksize)
 					# END for each chunk to put
 				else:
+					task.add_scheduled_items(chunksize)
 					task.process(chunksize)
 				# END try efficient looping
 				
 				if remainder:
+					task.add_scheduled_items(remainder)
 					task.process(remainder)
 				# END handle chunksize
 			# END handle serial mode
@@ -348,6 +357,9 @@ class Pool(object):
 				self._workers.append(worker)
 			# END for each new worker to create
 		elif cur_count > size:
+			# we can safely increase the size, even from serial mode, as we would
+			# only be able to do this if the serial ( sync ) mode finished processing.
+			# Just adding more workers is not a problem at all.
 			del_count = cur_count - size
 			for i in range(del_count):
 				self._workers[i].stop_and_join()
@@ -451,6 +463,11 @@ class Pool(object):
 			# END add task relation
 		# END handle input channels for connections
 		
+		# fix locks - in serial mode, the task does not need real locks
+		if self.size() == 0:
+			task._slock = DummyLock()
+		# END improve locks
+		
 		return rc
 			
 	#} END interface 
diff --git a/lib/git/async/task.py b/lib/git/async/task.py
index 4e8aef54..cf486f48 100644
--- a/lib/git/async/task.py
+++ b/lib/git/async/task.py
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ class OutputChannelTask(Node):
 					'_out_wc', 			# output write channel
 					'_exc',				# exception caught
 					'_done',			# True if we are done
+					'_scheduled_items', # amount of scheduled items that will be processed in total
+					'_slock',			# lock for scheduled items
 					'fun',				# function to call with items read
 					'min_count', 		# minimum amount of items to produce, None means no override
 					'max_chunksize',	# maximium amount of items to process per process call
@@ -33,6 +35,8 @@ class OutputChannelTask(Node):
 		self._out_wc = None					# to be set later
 		self._exc = None
 		self._done = False
+		self._scheduled_items = 0
+		self._slock = threading.Lock()
 		self.fun = fun
 		self.min_count = None
 		self.max_chunksize = 0				# note set
@@ -50,6 +54,7 @@ class OutputChannelTask(Node):
 		"""Set the write channel to the given one
 		:note: resets it done state in order to allow proper queue handling"""
 		self._done = False
+		self._scheduled_items = 0
 		self._out_wc = wc
 		
 	def close(self):
@@ -65,6 +70,21 @@ class OutputChannelTask(Node):
 		""":return: Exception caught during last processing or None"""
 		return self._exc
 
+	def add_scheduled_items(self, count):
+		"""Add the given amount of scheduled items to this task"""
+		self._slock.acquire()
+		self._scheduled_items += count 
+		self._slock.release()
+		
+	def scheduled_item_count(self):
+		""":return: amount of scheduled items for this task"""
+		self._slock.acquire()
+		try:
+			return self._scheduled_items
+		finally:
+			self._slock.release()
+		# END threadsafe return
+
 	def process(self, count=0):
 		"""Process count items and send the result individually to the output channel"""
 		items = self._read(count)
@@ -78,14 +98,33 @@ class OutputChannelTask(Node):
 			wc = self._out_wc
 			if self.apply_single:
 				for item in items:
-					wc.write(self.fun(item))
+					rval = self.fun(item)
+					# decrement afterwards, the its unscheduled once its produced  
+					self._slock.acquire()
+					self._scheduled_items -= 1
+					self._slock.release()
+					wc.write(rval)
 				# END for each item
 			else:
-				wc.write(self.fun(items))
+				# shouldn't apply single be the default anyway ? 
+				# The task designers should chunk them up in advance
+				rvals = self.fun(items)
+				self._slock.acquire()
+				self._scheduled_items -= len(items)
+				self._slock.release()
+				for rval in rvals:
+					wc.write(rval)
 			# END handle single apply
 		except Exception, e:
 			self._exc = e
 			self.set_done()
+			# unschedule all, we don't know how many have been produced actually
+			# but only if we don't apply single please 
+			if not self.apply_single:
+				self._slock.acquire()
+				self._scheduled_items -= len(items)
+				self._slock.release()
+			# END unschedule all
 		# END exception handling
 		del(wc)
 		
@@ -189,6 +228,10 @@ class InputChannelTask(OutputChannelTask):
 		#  for each task, which would allow to precisely determine whether 
 		#  the pool as to be triggered, and bail out early. Problem would 
 		#	be the 
+		# * Perhaps one shouldn't seek the perfect solution , but instead
+		#  document whats working and what not, or under which conditions.
+		#  The whole system is simple, but gets more complicated the
+		#  smarter it wants to be.
 		if isinstance(self._in_rc, RPoolChannel) and self._in_rc._pool is self._pool_ref():
 			self._read = self._in_rc._read
 		
diff --git a/lib/git/async/util.py b/lib/git/async/util.py
index 85d44694..55766579 100644
--- a/lib/git/async/util.py
+++ b/lib/git/async/util.py
@@ -41,6 +41,18 @@ def cpu_count():
 #} END routines
 
 
+
+class DummyLock(object):
+	"""An object providing a do-nothing lock interface for use in sync mode"""
+	__slots__ = tuple()
+	
+	def acquire(self):
+		pass
+	
+	def release(self):
+		pass
+	
+
 class SyncQueue(deque):
 	"""Adapter to allow using a deque like a queue, without locking"""
 	def get(self, block=True, timeout=None):
@@ -59,7 +71,7 @@ class SyncQueue(deque):
 class HSCondition(_Condition):
 	"""An attempt to make conditions less blocking, which gains performance 
 	in return by sleeping less"""
-	delay = 0.00005		# reduces wait times, but increases overhead
+	delay = 0.00002		# reduces wait times, but increases overhead
 	
 	def wait(self, timeout=None):
 		waiter = Lock()