summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/source
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/source')
-rw-r--r--doc/source/dev/development_workflow.rst2
-rw-r--r--doc/source/user/basics.subclassing.rst4
2 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/doc/source/dev/development_workflow.rst b/doc/source/dev/development_workflow.rst
index 1665cfddb..34535b2f5 100644
--- a/doc/source/dev/development_workflow.rst
+++ b/doc/source/dev/development_workflow.rst
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ Rewriting commit history
Do this only for your own feature branches.
-There's an embarrassing typo in a commit you made? Or perhaps the you
+There's an embarrassing typo in a commit you made? Or perhaps you
made several false starts you would like the posterity not to see.
This can be done via *interactive rebasing*.
diff --git a/doc/source/user/basics.subclassing.rst b/doc/source/user/basics.subclassing.rst
index d8d104220..8ffa31688 100644
--- a/doc/source/user/basics.subclassing.rst
+++ b/doc/source/user/basics.subclassing.rst
@@ -92,8 +92,8 @@ Implications for subclassing
If we subclass ndarray, we need to deal not only with explicit
construction of our array type, but also :ref:`view-casting` or
-:ref:`new-from-template`. NumPy has the machinery to do this, and this
-machinery that makes subclassing slightly non-standard.
+:ref:`new-from-template`. NumPy has the machinery to do this, and it is
+this machinery that makes subclassing slightly non-standard.
There are two aspects to the machinery that ndarray uses to support
views and new-from-template in subclasses.