diff options
author | Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@digia.com> | 2012-09-18 15:53:33 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@digia.com> | 2012-09-18 15:53:33 +0200 |
commit | 6bbb7fbbac94d0f511a7bd0cbd50854ab643bfb2 (patch) | |
tree | d9c68d1cca0b3e352f1e438561f3e504e641a08f /Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGAbstractState.cpp | |
parent | d0424a769059c84ae20beb3c217812792ea6726b (diff) | |
download | qtwebkit-6bbb7fbbac94d0f511a7bd0cbd50854ab643bfb2.tar.gz |
Imported WebKit commit c7503cef7ecb236730d1309676ab9fc723fd061d (http://svn.webkit.org/repository/webkit/trunk@128886)
New snapshot with various build fixes
Diffstat (limited to 'Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGAbstractState.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGAbstractState.cpp | 47 |
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGAbstractState.cpp b/Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGAbstractState.cpp index b860a7310..153ba311c 100644 --- a/Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGAbstractState.cpp +++ b/Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGAbstractState.cpp @@ -147,7 +147,13 @@ void AbstractState::initialize(Graph& graph) for (size_t i = 0; i < graph.m_mustHandleValues.size(); ++i) { AbstractValue value; value.setMostSpecific(graph.m_mustHandleValues[i]); - block->valuesAtHead.operand(graph.m_mustHandleValues.operandForIndex(i)).merge(value); + int operand = graph.m_mustHandleValues.operandForIndex(i); + block->valuesAtHead.operand(operand).merge(value); +#if DFG_ENABLE(DEBUG_PROPAGATION_VERBOSE) + dataLog(" Initializing Block #%u, operand r%d, to ", blockIndex, operand); + block->valuesAtHead.operand(operand).dump(WTF::dataFile()); + dataLog("\n"); +#endif } block->cfaShouldRevisit = true; } @@ -1093,14 +1099,21 @@ bool AbstractState::execute(unsigned indexInBlock) break; case NewArray: - case NewArrayBuffer: - node.setCanExit(false); + node.setCanExit(true); forNode(nodeIndex).set(m_graph.globalObjectFor(node.codeOrigin)->arrayStructure()); m_haveStructures = true; break; + case NewArrayBuffer: + // Unless we're having a bad time, this node can change its mind about what structure + // it uses. + node.setCanExit(false); + forNode(nodeIndex).set(SpecArray); + break; + case NewArrayWithSize: - speculateInt32Unary(node); + node.setCanExit(true); + forNode(node.child1()).filter(SpecInt32); forNode(nodeIndex).set(m_graph.globalObjectFor(node.codeOrigin)->arrayStructure()); m_haveStructures = true; break; @@ -1293,20 +1306,6 @@ bool AbstractState::execute(unsigned indexInBlock) !value.m_currentKnownStructure.isSubsetOf(set) || !isCellSpeculation(value.m_type)); value.filter(set); - // This is likely to be unnecessary, but it's conservative, and that's a good thing. - // This is trying to avoid situations where the CFA proves that this structure check - // must fail due to a future structure proof. We have two options at that point. We - // can either compile all subsequent code as we would otherwise, or we can ensure - // that the subsequent code is never reachable. The former is correct because the - // Proof Is Infallible (TM) -- hence even if we don't force the subsequent code to - // be unreachable, it must be unreachable nonetheless. But imagine what would happen - // if the proof was borked. In the former case, we'd get really bizarre bugs where - // we assumed that the structure of this object was known even though it wasn't. In - // the latter case, we'd have a slight performance pathology because this would be - // turned into an OSR exit unnecessarily. Which would you rather have? - if (value.m_currentKnownStructure.isClear() - || value.m_futurePossibleStructure.isClear()) - m_isValid = false; m_haveStructures = true; break; } @@ -1325,10 +1324,6 @@ bool AbstractState::execute(unsigned indexInBlock) ASSERT(value.isClear() || isCellSpeculation(value.m_type)); // Value could be clear if we've proven must-exit due to a speculation statically known to be bad. value.filter(node.structure()); - // See comment in CheckStructure for why this is here. - if (value.m_currentKnownStructure.isClear() - || value.m_futurePossibleStructure.isClear()) - m_isValid = false; m_haveStructures = true; node.setCanExit(true); break; @@ -1337,9 +1332,11 @@ bool AbstractState::execute(unsigned indexInBlock) case PutStructure: case PhantomPutStructure: node.setCanExit(false); - clobberStructures(indexInBlock); - forNode(node.child1()).set(node.structureTransitionData().newStructure); - m_haveStructures = true; + if (!forNode(node.child1()).m_currentKnownStructure.isClear()) { + clobberStructures(indexInBlock); + forNode(node.child1()).set(node.structureTransitionData().newStructure); + m_haveStructures = true; + } break; case GetButterfly: case AllocatePropertyStorage: |